Author:
Wang Ying,Liang Qian,Lu Bian,Shen Hong,Liu Shuyan,Shi Ya,Leptihn Sebastian,Li Hong,Wei Jin,Liu Chengzhi,Xiao Hailong,Zheng Xiaoling,Liu Chao,Chen Huan
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Safety issues of probiotic products have been reported frequently in recent years. Ten bacterial strains isolated from seven commercial probiotic products on market were evaluated for their safety, by whole-genome analysis.
Results
We found that the bacterial species of three probiotic products were incorrectly labeled. Furthermore, six probiotic product isolates (PPS) contained genes for the production of toxic metabolites, while another three strains contained virulence genes, which might pose a potential health risk. In addition, three of them have drug-resistance genes, among which two strains potentially displayed multidrug resistance. One isolate has in silico predicted transferable genes responsible for toxic metabolite production, and they could potentially transfer to human gut microflora or environmental bacteria. Isolates of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis are associated with low risk for human consumption. Based on a comparative genome analysis, we found that the isolated Enterococcus faecium TK-P5D clustered with a well-defined probiotic strain, while E. faecalis TK-P4B clustered with a pathogenic strain.
Conclusions
Our work clearly illustrates that whole-genome analysis is a useful method to evaluate the quality and safety of probiotic products. Regulatory quality control and stringent regulations on probiotic products are needed to ensure safe consumption and protect human health.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. FAO/WHO. Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food, report of a joint FAO/WHO working group on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. London Ontario: World Health Organization; 2002.
2. Rouanet A, Bolca S, Bru A, Claes I, Cvejic H, Girgis H, Harper A, Lavergne SN, Mathys S. Live biotherapeutic products, A Road Map for Safety Assessment. Front Med. 2020;7:237.
3. Weese JS, Martin H. Assessment of commercial probiotic bacterial contents and label accuracy. Can Vet J. 2011;52(1):43–6.
4. Patro JN, Ramachandran P, Barnaba T, Mammel MK, Lewis JL, Elkins CA: Culture-Independent Metagenomic Surveillance of Commercially Available Probiotics with High-Throughput Next-Generation Sequencing. mSphere. 2016;1(2):e00057–16.
5. Sybesma W, Molenaar D, Wv IJ, Venema K, Kort R. Genome instability in Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(7):2233–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03566-12.
Cited by
42 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献