Qualifying and quantifying the precision medicine rhetoric

Author:

Lee Jasmine,Hamideh Dina,Nebeker CamilleORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background With the rise of precision medicine efforts worldwide, our study objective was to describe and map the emerging precision medicine landscape. A Google search was conducted between June 19, 2017 to July 20, 2017 to examine how “precision medicine” and its analogous terminology were used to describe precision medicine efforts. Resulting web-pages were reviewed for geographic location, data type(s), program aim(s), sample size, duration, and the key search terms used and recorded in a database. Descriptive statistics were applied to quantify terminology used to describe specific precision medicine efforts. Qualitative data were analyzed for content and patterns. Results Of the 108 programs identified through our search, 84% collected only biospecimen(s) and, of those that collected at least two data types, 42% mentioned both Electronic Health Records (EHR) and biospecimen. Given the majority of efforts limited to biospecimen(s) use, genetic research seems to be prioritized in association with precision medicine. Roughly, 54% were found to collect two or more data types, which limits the output of information that may contribute to understanding of the interplay of genetic, lifestyle, and environmental factors. Over half were government-funded with roughly a third being industry-funded. Most initiatives were concentrated in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study to map and qualify the global precision medicine landscape. Our findings reveal that precision medicine efforts range from large model cohort studies involving multidimensional, longitudinal data to biorepositories with a collection of blood samples. We present a spectrum where past, present, and future PM-like efforts can fall based on their scope and potential impact. If precision medicine is based on genes, lifestyle and environmental factors, we recommend programs claiming to be precision medicine initiatives to incorporate multidimensional data that can inform a holistic approach to healthcare.

Funder

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Division of Biological Infrastructure

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Genetics,Biotechnology

Reference38 articles.

1. Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. New Eng J Med. 2015;372:793–5.

2. Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network for Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease. In: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. 2011. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13284/toward-precision-medicine-building-a-knowledge-network-for-biomedical-research. Accessed 20 June 2017.

3. Remarks by the President on Precision Medicine. In: The White House President Barack Obama. Office of Press Secretary. 2015. obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/01/30/remarks-president-precision-medicine. Accessed 1 Aug 2017.

4. All of Us Research Program Operational Protocol. National Institutes of Health. 2018. https://allofus.nih.gov/sites/default/files/aou_operational_protocol_v1.7_mar_2018.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2017.

5. Chavarro JE, Rich-Edwards JW, Gaskins AJ, et al. Contributions of the nurses’ health studies to reproductive Health Research. Am J Public Health. 2016;106:1669–76.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3