Author:
Shi Lupeng,Yang Xiufeng,Cha Muha,Lyu Tianshu,Wang Lidong,Zhou Shengyang,Dong Yuehuan,Dou Huashan,Zhang Honghai
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Mongolian gazelle (Procapra gutturosa) population has shown a considerable range of contractions and local extinctions over the last century, owing to habitat fragmentation and poaching. A thorough understanding of the genetic diversity and structure of Mongolian gazelle populations in fragmented habitats is critical for planning effective conservation strategies.
Result
In this study, we used eight microsatellite loci and mitochondrial cytochrome b (Cytb) to compare the levels of genetic diversity and genetic structure of Mongolian gazelle populations in the Hulun Lake National Nature Reserve (HLH) with those in the China-Mongolia border area (BJ). The results showed that the nucleotide diversity and observed heterozygosity of the HLH population were lower than those of the BJ population. Moreover, the HLH and BJ populations showed genetic differentiation. We concluded that the HLH population had lower genetic diversity and a distinct genetic structure compared with the BJ population.
Conclusion
The genetic diversity of fragmented Mongolian gazelle populations, can be improved by protecting these populations while reinforcing their gene exchange with other populations. For example, attempts can be made to introduce new individuals with higher genetic diversity from other populations to reduce inbreeding.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference59 articles.
1. Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contu S, Lysenko I, Senior RA, Börger L, Bennett DJ, Choimes A, Collen B, et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature. 2015;520(7545):45–50.
2. Peery MZ, Hall LA, Sellas A, Beissinger SR, Moritz C, Bérubé M, Raphael MG, Nelson SK, Golightly RT, McFarlane-Tranquilla L, et al. Genetic analyses of historic and modern marbled murrelets suggest decoupling of migration and gene flow after habitat fragmentation. P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI. 2010;277(1682):697–706.
3. Westemeier RL, Brawn JD, Simpson SA, Esker TL, Jansen RW, Walk JW, Kershner EL, Bouzat JL, Paige KN. Tracking the long-term decline and recovery of an isolated population. Science. 1998;282(5394):1695–8.
4. Fagan WF, Holmes EE. Quantifying the extinction vortex. ECOL LETT. 2006;9(1):51–60.
5. Evans SR, Sheldon BC. Interspecific patterns of genetic diversity in birds: correlations with extinction risk. CONSERV BIOL. 2008;22(4):1016–25.