Investigating performance metrics for container-based HPC environments using x86 and OpenPOWER systems

Abstract

AbstractContainer-based High-Performance Computing (HPC) is changing the way computation is performed and reproduced without sacrificing the raw performance compared to hypervisor-assisted virtualization technologies. It primarily supports continuously evolving data-intensive applications such as computational fluid dynamics, seismic tomography, molecular biology, and Proteomics. OpenPOWER systems, unlike the x86 systems, use the POWER-compliant processor to exploit instruction-level and thread-level parallelism heavily. In our previous work, we designed and developed a Containerized HPC environment (cHPCe) from the scratch using Linux namespaces on OpenPOWER systems. This paper aims to provide an in-depth performance analysis of the Containerized HPC environment using x86 systems and Containerized HPC environment using the OpenPOWER system, on systems’ subcomponents, processor, memory, interconnect, and IO. This sub-component analysis provides an insight on several aspects of the system performance. To the best of our knowledge, no research has been reported yet for such a comparative analysis that designs cHPCe for both x86 and OpenPOWER systems. The performance of the developed cHPCe is compared with BareMetals, and VMs using the benchmarks HPCC, and IOZone. Our experimental results achieve 0.13% less compute performance penalty at its peak performance on cHPCe compared to the BareMetal-based solution for x86 systems. In contrast, a VM-based solution introduces an overhead of 20% and 4.83% in x86 and OpenPOWER cases, respectively. Moreover, the x86 and OpenPOWER systems observe inconsistent behavior for memory performance with a worst-case penalty of 9.68% and 6.64% compared to achieved peak performance, respectively. However, similar behavior is reported for cHPCe with an overhead of less than 3% and 2% in the worst case for the latency and bandwidth, respectively, compared to the BareMetal for network and disk performance. Our experimental results reveal that the containerized OpenPOWER environment represents a viable alternative to the counterpart x86 environment for the HPC solution.