Abstract
AbstractThis study analyzes the mechanisms by which short-time work (STW) schemes affect firm’s employment adjustments, using establishment-level data during the Great Recession from Japan. The findings show that STW leads to a decrease in both hiring and separations, with no significant positive effect on net employment. The observed curtailed hiring can be explained within the context of how STW promotes labor hoarding. STW encourages firms to maintain redundant employment by subsidizing the costs of labor hoarding. The excess labor surplus in firms adopting STW diminishes the incentive to recruit new workers in anticipation of the recovery period. Furthermore, as firms generally lack the motivation to hoard marginal workers, STW may exacerbate job security disparities between regular and marginal workers. These findings have important implications for policy evaluation, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive understanding of the potential adverse consequences of STW on labor market entrants and marginal workers.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Balleer, A., Gehrke, B., Lechthaler, W., Merkl, C.: Does short-time work save jobs? A business cycle analysis. Eur. Econ. Rev. 84, 99–122 (2016)
2. Bellmann, L., Gerner, H., Upward, R.: The response of German establishments to the 2008–2009 economic crisis. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 137 (2012)
3. Biddle, J.E.: Retrospectives: the cyclical behavior of labor productivity and the emergence of the labor hoarding concept. J. Econ. Perspect.perspect. 28(2), 197–212 (2014)
4. Boeri, T., Bruecker, H.: Short-time work benefits revisited: some lessons from the great recession. Econ. Policy 26(68), 697–765 (2011)
5. Brey, B., Hertweck, M.S.: The extension of short-time work schemes during the great recession: a story of success? Macroecon. Dyn.. Dyn. 24(2), 360–402 (2020)