Abstract
AbstractFirms in border regions typically deal with heterogeneous applicant pools that include both (foreign) domestic workers and cross-border commuters. However, we know little about recruiters’ workforce needs and hiring practices in cross-border labour markets. Based on a survey of real recruiters in Luxembourg, this study presents experimental and qualitative findings on the role of country of residence in recruiters’ hiring intentions against foreigners. Luxembourg presents a rarely studied but highly relevant case for hiring practices owing to a combination of a strong economy, strict labour market regulations, and a transnational workforce. Drawing on data from a factorial survey experiment, we found no discrimination against Portuguese and French applicants living in Luxembourg. Yet, (highly skilled) cross-border workers from France and Germany faced disadvantages regarding recruiters’ hiring intentions. However, differences in effect sizes between foreigners and cross-border workers were small and not statistically significant. When further asked about the potential challenges of recruiting in Luxembourg’s cross-border labour market, respondents expressed concerns about flexibility, poor social fit, and cultural differences in hiring foreign and cross-border employees. Overall, our study provides further points of reference for studies on hiring intentions in cross-border labour markets across Europe.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Aepli, M., Kuhn, A.: Open labor markets and firms’ substitution between training apprentices and hiring workers. Labour Econ. 70, 101979 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2021.101979
2. Aigner, D., Cain, G.G.: Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets. Ind. Labor Relations Rev. 30, 175–187 (1977)
3. Altonji, J.G., Pierret, C.R.: Employer learning and statistical discrimination. Q. J. Econ. 116, 313–350 (2001)
4. Amétépé, F., Hartmann-Hirsch, C.: An outstanding positioning of migrants and nationals: the case of Luxembourg. Popul. Rev. 50, 195–217 (2011)
5. Anseel, F., Lievens, F., Schollaert, E., Choragwicka, B.: Response rates in organizational science, 1995–2008: a meta-analytic review and guidelines for survey researchers. J. Bus. Psychol. 25, 335–349 (2010)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献