Author:
Zhong Yuan,Sun Ruijuan,Li Wei,Wang Weiqian,Che Jianpeng,Ji Linlin,Guo Bingrong,Zhai Chunbo
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The aim of this study was to assess the risk factors for anastomotic stricture in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy. Esophageal anastomotic stricture is the most common long-term complication for esophagectomy. The risk factors for esophageal anastomotic stricture still remain controversial.
Methods
MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched to identify observational studies reporting the risk factors for esophageal anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy. A meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the impact of various risk factors on esophageal anastomotic stricture. The GRADE [Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation] approach was used for quality assessment of evidence on outcome levels.
Results
This review included 14 studies evaluating 5987 patients.The meta-analysis found that anastomotic leakage (odds ratio [OR]: 2.75; 95% confidence interval[CI]:2.16–3.49), cardiovascular disease [OR:1.62; 95% CI: 1.22–2.16],diabete [OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.20–2.19] may be risk factors for esophageal anastomotic stricture.There were no association between neoadjuvant therapy [OR: 0.78; 95% CI:0.62–0.97], wide gastric conduit [OR:0.98; 95% CI: 0.37–2.56],mechanical anastomosis [OR: 0.84; 95% CI:0.47–1.48],colonic interposition[OR:0.20; 95% CI: 0.12–0.35],and transhiatal approach[OR:1.16; 95% CI:0.81–1.64],with the risk of esophageal anastomotic stricture.
Conclusions
This meta-analysis provides some evidence that anastomotic leakage,cardiovascular disease and diabete may be associated with higher rates of esophageal anastomotic stricture.Knowledge about those risk factors may influence treatment and procedure-related decisions,and possibly reduce the anastomotic stricture rate.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC