Author:
Høydahl Øystein,Edna Tom-Harald,Xanthoulis Athanasios,Lydersen Stian,Endreseth Birger Henning
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The number of older patients with rectal cancer is increasing. Treatment outcome discrepancies persist, despite similar treatment guidelines. To offer the oldest patients optimal individually adjusted care, further knowledge is needed regarding treatment strategy and outcome. The present study aimed to evaluate treatment, postoperative complications, and survival in older patients treated for rectal cancer.
Methods
This retrospective study included all 666 patients (n=255 females, n=411 males) treated for rectal cancer at Levanger Hospital during 1980-2016 (n=193 <65 years, n=329 65-79 years, n=144 ≥80 years). We performed logistic regression to analyse associations between complications, 90-day mortality, and explanatory variables. We performed a relative survival analysis to identify factors associated with short- and long-term survival.
Results
Despite a similar distribution of cancer stages across age-groups, patients aged ≥80 years were treated with a non-curative approach more frequently than younger age groups. Among patients aged ≥80 years, 42% underwent a non-curative treatment approach, compared to 25% of patients aged <65 years, and 25% of patients aged 65-79 years. The 90-day mortality was 15.3% among patients aged ≥80 years, compared to 5.7% among patients aged <65 years, and 9.4% among patients aged 65-79 years.
Among 431 (65%) patients treated with a major resection with curative intent, the 90-day mortality was 5.9% among patients aged ≥80 years (n=68), compared to 0.8% among patients aged <65 years (n=126), and 3.8% among patients aged 65-79 years (n=237). The rate of postoperative complications was 47.6%. Pneumonia was the only complication that occurred more frequently in the older patient group. The severity of complications increased with three factors: age, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, and >400 ml perioperative blood loss. Among patients that survived the first 90 days, the relative long-term survival rates, five-year local recurrence rates, and metastases rates were independent of age.
Conclusion
Patients aged ≥80 years were less likely to undergo a major resection with curative intent and experienced more severe complications after surgery than patients aged <80 years. When patients aged ≥80 years were treated with a major resection with curative intent, the long-term survival rate was comparable to that of younger patients.
Funder
NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Genetics,Oncology
Reference64 articles.
1. Cancer Registry of Norway. Cancer in Norway 2020 - Cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in Norway. Oslo: Cancer Registry of Norway, 2021. Available at: https://www.kreftregisteret.no/globalassets/cancer-in-norway/2020/cin-2020.pdf Accessed 23 June 2022.
2. Helsedirektoratet. Nasjonalt handlingsprogram med retningslinjer for diagnostikk, behandling og oppfølging av kreft i tykktarm og endetarm. (Norwegian) [National action program with guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of cancer of the colon and rectum]. 2019. Available at: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/retningslinjer/kreft-i-tykktarm-og-endetarm-handlingsprogram/Nasjonalt%20handlingsprogram%20kreft%20i%20tykktarm%20og%20endetarm.pdf/_/attachment/inline/15a3b670-d1eb-454c-b233-a43b7d636694:a187c33ef51e5e08a3890bd25c99fba242341aa3/Nasjonalt%20handlingsprogram%20kreft%20i%20tykktarm%20og%20endetarm.pdf Accessed June 23, 2022.
3. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery–the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982;69(10):613–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800691019.
4. Jullumstro E, Wibe A, Lydersen S, Edna TH. Violation of treatment guidelines – hazard for rectal cancer patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27(1):103–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1283-8.
5. Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, Fearon KC, Norderval S, Lobo DN, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2012;31(6):801–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.012.