Desmoglein 2 and desmocollin 2 depletions promote malignancy through distinct mechanisms in triple-negative and luminal breast cancer

Abstract

Abstract Background Aberrant expressions of desmoglein 2 (Dsg2) and desmocollin 2(Dsc2), the two most widely distributed desmosomal cadherins, have been found to play various roles in cancer in a context-dependent manner. Their specific roles on breast cancer (BC) and the potential mechanisms remain unclear. Methods The expressions of Dsg2 and Dsc2 in human BC tissues and cell lines were assessed by using bioinformatics analysis, immunohistochemistry and western blotting assays. Wound-healing and Transwell assays were performed to evaluate the cells’ migration and invasion abilities. Plate colony-forming and MTT assays were used to examine the cells’ capacity of proliferation. Mechanically, Dsg2 and Dsc2 knockdown-induced malignant behaviors were elucidated using western blotting assay as well as three inhibitors including MK2206 for AKT, PD98059 for ERK, and XAV-939 for β-catenin. Results We found reduced expressions of Dsg2 and Dsc2 in human BC tissues and cell lines compared to normal counterparts. Furthermore, shRNA-mediated downregulation of Dsg2 and Dsc2 could significantly enhance cell proliferation, migration and invasion in triple-negative MDA-MB-231 and luminal MCF-7 BC cells. Mechanistically, EGFR activity was decreased but downstream AKT and ERK pathways were both activated maybe through other activated protein tyrosine kinases in shDsg2 and shDsc2 MDA-MB-231 cells since protein tyrosine kinases are key drivers of triple-negative BC survival. Additionally, AKT inhibitor treatment displayed much stronger capacity to abolish shDsg2 and shDsc2 induced progression compared to ERK inhibition, which was due to feedback activation of AKT pathway induced by ERK inhibition. In contrast, all of EGFR, AKT and ERK activities were attenuated, whereas β-catenin was accumulated in shDsg2 and shDsc2 MCF-7 cells. These results indicate that EGFR-targeted therapy is not a good choice for BC patients with low Dsg2 or Dsc2 expression. Comparatively, AKT inhibitors may be more helpful to triple-negative BC patients with low Dsg2 or Dsc2 expression, while therapies targeting β-catenin can be considered for luminal BC patients with low Dsg2 or Dsc2 expression. Conclusion Our finding demonstrate that single knockdown of Dsg2 or Dsc2 could promote proliferation, motility and invasion in triple-negative MDA-MB-231 and luminal MCF-7 cells. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanisms were cellular context-specific and distinct.