Author:
Bizuayehu Habtamu Mellie,Belachew Sewunet Admasu,Jahan Shafkat,Diaz Abbey,Baxi Siddhartha,Griffiths Kalinda,Garvey Gail
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Indigenous peoples worldwide experience inequitable cancer outcomes, and it is unclear if this is underpinned by differences in or inadequate use of endocrine treatment (ET), often used in conjunction with other cancer treatments. Previous studies examining ET use in Indigenous peoples have predominately focused on the sub-national level, often resulting in small sample sizes with limited statistical power. This systematic review aimed to collate the findings ofarticles on ET utilisation for Indigenous cancer patients and describe relevant factors that may influence ET use.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting ET use for cancer among Indigenous populations worldwide. PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for relevant articles. A random-effect meta-analysis was used to pool proportions of ET use. We also performed a subgroup analysis (such as with sample sizes) and a meta-regression to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity. A socio-ecological model was used to present relevant factors that could impact ET use.
Results
Thirteen articles reported ET utilisation among Indigenous populations, yielding a pooled estimate of 67% (95% CI:54 − 80), which is comparable to that of Indigenous populations 67% (95% CI: 53 − 81). However, among studies with sufficiently sized study sample/cohorts (≥ 500), Indigenous populations had a 14% (62%; 95% CI:43 − 82) lower ET utilisation than non-Indigenous populations (76%; 95% CI: 60 − 92). The ET rate in Indigenous peoples of the USA (e.g., American Indian) and New Zealand (e.g., Māori) was 72% (95% CI:56–88) and 60% (95% CI:49–71), respectively. Compared to non-Indigenous populations, a higher proportion of Indigenous populations were diagnosed with advanced cancer, at younger age, had limited access to health services, lower socio-economic status, and a higher prevalence of comorbidities.
Conclusions
Indigenous cancer patients have lower ET utilisation than non-Indigenous cancer patients, despite the higher rate of advanced cancer at diagnosis. While reasons for these disparities are unclear, they are likely reflecting, at least to some degree, inequitable access to cancer treatment services. Strengthening the provision of and access to culturally appropriate cancer care and treatment services may enhance ET utilisation in Indigenous population. This study protocol was registered on Prospero (CRD42023403562).
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) funded Centre of Research Excellence (CRE) in Targeted Approaches to Improve Cancer Services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians
University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine Research Fellowship
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Investigator Grant
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference85 articles.
1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Weiderpass E, Soerjomataram I. The ever-increasing importance of cancer as a leading cause of premature death worldwide. Cancer. 2021;127(16):3029–30.
2. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.
3. United Nations. Indigenous peoples, Indigenous voices factsheet. Who are indigenous peoples? Cited on 11/0/2023 at: https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/5session_factsheet1.pdf.
4. The World Bank. Indigenous Peoples. Last Updated: April 14, 2022. Cited on 19/01/2023 at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/indigenouspeoples#1.
5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance framework. Key facts. 2023. Retrieved on 18/01/2023 at: https://www.indigenoushpf.gov.au/measures/1-08-cancer.