Abstract
Abstract
Background
Air pollution is one of the main concerns for the health of European citizens, and cities are currently striving to accomplish EU air pollution regulation. The 2020 COVID-19 lockdown measures can be seen as an unintended but effective experiment to assess the impact of traffic restriction policies on air pollution. Our objective was to estimate the impact of the lockdown measures on NO2 concentrations and health in the two largest Italian cities.
Methods
NO2 concentration datasets were built using data deriving from a 1-month citizen science monitoring campaign that took place in Milan and Rome just before the Italian lockdown period. Annual mean NO2 concentrations were estimated for a lockdown scenario (Scenario 1) and a scenario without lockdown (Scenario 2), by applying city-specific annual adjustment factors to the 1-month data. The latter were estimated deriving data from Air Quality Network stations and by applying a machine learning approach. NO2 spatial distribution was estimated at a neighbourhood scale by applying Land Use Random Forest models for the two scenarios. Finally, the impact of lockdown on health was estimated by subtracting attributable deaths for Scenario 1 and those for Scenario 2, both estimated by applying literature-based dose–response function on the counterfactual concentrations of 10 μg/m3.
Results
The Land Use Random Forest models were able to capture 41–42% of the total NO2 variability. Passing from Scenario 2 (annual NO2 without lockdown) to Scenario 1 (annual NO2 with lockdown), the population-weighted exposure to NO2 for Milan and Rome decreased by 15.1% and 15.3% on an annual basis. Considering the 10 μg/m3 counterfactual, prevented deaths were respectively 213 and 604.
Conclusions
Our results show that the lockdown had a beneficial impact on air quality and human health. However, compliance with the current EU legal limit is not enough to avoid a high number of NO2 attributable deaths. This contribution reaffirms the potentiality of the citizen science approach and calls for more ambitious traffic calming policies and a re-evaluation of the legal annual limit value for NO2 for the protection of human health.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference47 articles.
1. Aanensen DM, Huntley DM, Feil EJ, et al. EpiCollect: linking smartphones to web applications for epidemiology, ecology and community data collection. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(9): e6968. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006968.
2. AEA Energy and Environment. Diffusion Tubes for Ambient NO2 Monitoring: Practical Guidance. 2008. (https://laqm.defra.gov.uk/documents/0802141004_NO2_WG_PracticalGuidance_Issue1a.pdfAvailable at: Last access 10/2021).
3. Agenzia Mobilità Ambiente Territorio (AMAT). Analisi della variazione degli indicatori relativi ai sistemi di mobilità di Milano a seguito dell’emergenza Covid-19. 2020. (https://milancovid-19impact.weebly.com/Available online, last access April 2021,).
4. Araki S, Shima M, Yamamoto K. Spatiotemporal land use random forest model for estimating metropolitan NO2 exposure in Japan. Science of The Total Environment. 2018;634:1269–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.324 (ISSN 0048–9697).
5. ARPA - Regional Environmental Protection Agency of Lombardy. Inventario Emissioni in Atmosfera (INEMAR). 2018.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献