Multivariate GWAS of Alzheimer’s disease CSF biomarker profiles implies GRIN2D in synaptic functioning
-
Published:2023-10-04
Issue:1
Volume:15
Page:
-
ISSN:1756-994X
-
Container-title:Genome Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Genome Med
Author:
Neumann Alexander, Ohlei Olena, Küçükali Fahri, Bos Isabelle J., Timsina Jigyasha, Vos Stephanie, Prokopenko Dmitry, Tijms Betty M., Andreasson Ulf, Blennow Kaj, Vandenberghe Rik, Scheltens Philip, Teunissen Charlotte E., Engelborghs Sebastiaan, Frisoni Giovanni B., Blin Oliver, Richardson Jill C., Bordet Régis, Lleó Alberto, Alcolea Daniel, Popp Julius, Marsh Thomas W., Gorijala Priyanka, Clark Christopher, Peyratout Gwendoline, Martinez-Lage Pablo, Tainta Mikel, Dobson Richard J. B., Legido-Quigley Cristina, Van Broeckhoven Christine, Tanzi Rudolph E., ten Kate Mara, Lill Christina M., Barkhof Frederik, Cruchaga Carlos, Lovestone Simon, Streffer Johannes, Zetterberg Henrik, Visser Pieter Jelle, Sleegers Kristel, Bertram LarsORCID,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have identified several risk loci, but many remain unknown. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers may aid in gene discovery and we previously demonstrated that six CSF biomarkers (β-amyloid, total/phosphorylated tau, NfL, YKL-40, and neurogranin) cluster into five principal components (PC), each representing statistically independent biological processes. Here, we aimed to (1) identify common genetic variants associated with these CSF profiles, (2) assess the role of associated variants in AD pathophysiology, and (3) explore potential sex differences.
Methods
We performed GWAS for each of the five biomarker PCs in two multi-center studies (EMIF-AD and ADNI). In total, 973 participants (n = 205 controls, n = 546 mild cognitive impairment, n = 222 AD) were analyzed for 7,433,949 common SNPs and 19,511 protein-coding genes. Structural equation models tested whether biomarker PCs mediate genetic risk effects on AD, and stratified and interaction models probed for sex-specific effects.
Results
Five loci showed genome-wide significant association with CSF profiles, two were novel (rs145791381 [inflammation] and GRIN2D [synaptic functioning]) and three were previously described (APOE, TMEM106B, and CHI3L1). Follow-up analyses of the two novel signals in independent datasets only supported the GRIN2D locus, which contains several functionally interesting candidate genes. Mediation tests indicated that variants in APOE are associated with AD status via processes related to amyloid and tau pathology, while markers in TMEM106B and CHI3L1 are associated with AD only via neuronal injury/inflammation. Additionally, seven loci showed sex-specific associations with AD biomarkers.
Conclusions
These results suggest that pathway and sex-specific analyses can improve our understanding of AD genetics and may contribute to precision medicine.
Funder
Research Foundation Flanders Universiteit Antwerpen HorizonEurope Research and Innovation Programme European Research Council NIHR biomedical research centre at UCLH Lifebrain EU Horizon 2020 project Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Cure Alzheimer’s Fund Universität zu Lübeck
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics (clinical),Genetics,Molecular Biology,Molecular Medicine
Reference75 articles.
1. Sims R, Hill M, Williams J. The multiplex model of the genetics of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23:311–22. 2. Olsson B, Lautner R, Andreasson U, Öhrfelt A, Portelius E, Bjerke M, Hölttä M, Rosén C, Olsson C, Strobel G, et al. CSF and blood biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:673–84. 3. Neumann A, Küçükali F, Bos I, Vos SJB, Engelborghs S, De Pooter T, Joris G, De Rijk P, De Roeck E, Tsolaki M, et al. Rare variants in IFFO1, DTNB, NLRC3 and SLC22A10 associate with Alzheimer’s disease CSF profile of neuronal injury and inflammation. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;26:1–10. 4. Bos I, Vos S, Vandenberghe R, Scheltens P, Engelborghs S, Frisoni G, Molinuevo JL, Wallin A, Lleó A, Popp J, et al. The EMIF-AD multimodal biomarker discovery study: design, methods and cohort characteristics. Alzheimer’s Res Ther. 2018;10:1–9. 5. Shaw LM, Vanderstichele H, Knapik-Czajka M, Clark CM, Aisen PS, Petersen RC, Blennow K, Soares H, Simon A, Lewczuk P, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker signature in Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative subjects. Ann Neurol. 2009;65:403–13.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|