Demonstrating trustworthiness when collecting and sharing genomic data: public views across 22 countries
-
Published:2021-05-25
Issue:1
Volume:13
Page:
-
ISSN:1756-994X
-
Container-title:Genome Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Genome Med
Author:
Milne RichardORCID, Morley Katherine I., Almarri Mohamed A., Anwer Shamim, Atutornu Jerome, Baranova Elena E., Bevan Paul, Cerezo Maria, Cong Yali, Costa Alessia, Critchley Christine, Fernow Josepine, Goodhand Peter, Hasan Qurratulain, Hibino Aiko, Houeland Gry, Howard Heidi C., Hussain S. Zakir, Malmgren Charlotta Ingvoldstad, Izhevskaya Vera L., Jędrzejak Aleksandra, Jinhong Cao, Kimura Megumi, Kleiderman Erika, Leach Brandi, Liu Keying, Mascalzoni Deborah, Mendes Álvaro, Minari Jusaku, Nicol Dianne, Niemiec Emilia, Patch Christine, Pollard Jack, Prainsack Barbara, Rivière Marie, Robarts Lauren, Roberts Jonathan, Romano Virginia, Sheerah Haytham A., Smith James, Soulier Alexandra, Steed Claire, Stefànsdóttir Vigdis, Tandre Cornelia, Thorogood Adrian, Voigt Torsten H., Wang Nan, West Anne V., Yoshizawa Go, Middleton Anna
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Public trust is central to the collection of genomic and health data and the sustainability of genomic research. To merit trust, those involved in collecting and sharing data need to demonstrate they are trustworthy. However, it is unclear what measures are most likely to demonstrate this.
Methods
We analyse the ‘Your DNA, Your Say’ online survey of public perspectives on genomic data sharing including responses from 36,268 individuals across 22 low-, middle- and high-income countries, gathered in 15 languages. We examine how participants perceived the relative value of measures to demonstrate the trustworthiness of those using donated DNA and/or medical information. We examine between-country variation and present a consolidated ranking of measures.
Results
Providing transparent information about who will benefit from data access was the most important measure to increase trust, endorsed by more than 50% of participants across 20 of 22 countries. It was followed by the option to withdraw data and transparency about who is using data and why. Variation was found for the importance of measures, notably information about sanctions for misuse of data—endorsed by 5% in India but almost 60% in Japan. A clustering analysis suggests alignment between some countries in the assessment of specific measures, such as the UK and Canada, Spain and Mexico and Portugal and Brazil. China and Russia are less closely aligned with other countries in terms of the value of the measures presented.
Conclusions
Our findings highlight the importance of transparency about data use and about the goals and potential benefits associated with data sharing, including to whom such benefits accrue. They show that members of the public value knowing what benefits accrue from the use of data. The study highlights the importance of locally sensitive measures to increase trust as genomic data sharing continues globally.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics (clinical),Genetics,Molecular Biology,Molecular Medicine
Reference32 articles.
1. Kaye J. The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2012;13(1):415–31. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-082410-101454. 2. Clayton EW, Halverson CM, Sathe NA, Malin BA. A systematic literature review of individuals’ perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States. PLoS One. 2018;13(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204417. 3. Ghafur S, Dael JV, Leis M, Darzi A, Sheikh A. Public perceptions on data sharing: key insights from the UK and the USA. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;0(0). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30161-8. 4. Critchley C, Nicol D, Otlowski M. The impact of commercialisation and genetic data sharing arrangements on public trust and the intention to participate in biobank research. Public Health Genomics. 2015;18(3):160–72. https://doi.org/10.1159/000375441. 5. Gaskell G, Gottweis H, Starkbaum J, Gerber MM, Broerse J, Gottweis U, et al. Publics and biobanks: Pan-European diversity and the challenge of responsible innovation. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21(1):14–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2012.104.
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|