Demonstrating trustworthiness when collecting and sharing genomic data: public views across 22 countries

Author:

Milne RichardORCID,Morley Katherine I.,Almarri Mohamed A.,Anwer Shamim,Atutornu Jerome,Baranova Elena E.,Bevan Paul,Cerezo Maria,Cong Yali,Costa Alessia,Critchley Christine,Fernow Josepine,Goodhand Peter,Hasan Qurratulain,Hibino Aiko,Houeland Gry,Howard Heidi C.,Hussain S. Zakir,Malmgren Charlotta Ingvoldstad,Izhevskaya Vera L.,Jędrzejak Aleksandra,Jinhong Cao,Kimura Megumi,Kleiderman Erika,Leach Brandi,Liu Keying,Mascalzoni Deborah,Mendes Álvaro,Minari Jusaku,Nicol Dianne,Niemiec Emilia,Patch Christine,Pollard Jack,Prainsack Barbara,Rivière Marie,Robarts Lauren,Roberts Jonathan,Romano Virginia,Sheerah Haytham A.,Smith James,Soulier Alexandra,Steed Claire,Stefànsdóttir Vigdis,Tandre Cornelia,Thorogood Adrian,Voigt Torsten H.,Wang Nan,West Anne V.,Yoshizawa Go,Middleton Anna

Abstract

Abstract Background Public trust is central to the collection of genomic and health data and the sustainability of genomic research. To merit trust, those involved in collecting and sharing data need to demonstrate they are trustworthy. However, it is unclear what measures are most likely to demonstrate this. Methods We analyse the ‘Your DNA, Your Say’ online survey of public perspectives on genomic data sharing including responses from 36,268 individuals across 22 low-, middle- and high-income countries, gathered in 15 languages. We examine how participants perceived the relative value of measures to demonstrate the trustworthiness of those using donated DNA and/or medical information. We examine between-country variation and present a consolidated ranking of measures. Results Providing transparent information about who will benefit from data access was the most important measure to increase trust, endorsed by more than 50% of participants across 20 of 22 countries. It was followed by the option to withdraw data and transparency about who is using data and why. Variation was found for the importance of measures, notably information about sanctions for misuse of data—endorsed by 5% in India but almost 60% in Japan. A clustering analysis suggests alignment between some countries in the assessment of specific measures, such as the UK and Canada, Spain and Mexico and Portugal and Brazil. China and Russia are less closely aligned with other countries in terms of the value of the measures presented. Conclusions Our findings highlight the importance of transparency about data use and about the goals and potential benefits associated with data sharing, including to whom such benefits accrue. They show that members of the public value knowing what benefits accrue from the use of data. The study highlights the importance of locally sensitive measures to increase trust as genomic data sharing continues globally.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Genetics,Molecular Biology,Molecular Medicine

Cited by 40 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3