Development and validation of a trans-ancestry polygenic risk score for type 2 diabetes in diverse populations
-
Published:2022-06-29
Issue:1
Volume:14
Page:
-
ISSN:1756-994X
-
Container-title:Genome Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Genome Med
Author:
Ge TianORCID, Irvin Marguerite R., Patki Amit, Srinivasasainagendra Vinodh, Lin Yen-Feng, Tiwari Hemant K., Armstrong Nicole D., Benoit Barbara, Chen Chia-Yen, Choi Karmel W., Cimino James J., Davis Brittney H., Dikilitas Ozan, Etheridge Bethany, Feng Yen-Chen Anne, Gainer Vivian, Huang Hailiang, Jarvik Gail P., Kachulis Christopher, Kenny Eimear E., Khan Atlas, Kiryluk Krzysztof, Kottyan Leah, Kullo Iftikhar J., Lange Christoph, Lennon Niall, Leong Aaron, Malolepsza Edyta, Miles Ayme D., Murphy Shawn, Namjou Bahram, Narayan Renuka, O’Connor Mark J., Pacheco Jennifer A., Perez Emma, Rasmussen-Torvik Laura J., Rosenthal Elisabeth A., Schaid Daniel, Stamou Maria, Udler Miriam S., Wei Wei-Qi, Weiss Scott T., Ng Maggie C. Y., Smoller Jordan W., Lebo Matthew S., Meigs James B., Limdi Nita A., Karlson Elizabeth W.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a worldwide scourge caused by both genetic and environmental risk factors that disproportionately afflicts communities of color. Leveraging existing large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS), polygenic risk scores (PRS) have shown promise to complement established clinical risk factors and intervention paradigms, and improve early diagnosis and prevention of T2D. However, to date, T2D PRS have been most widely developed and validated in individuals of European descent. Comprehensive assessment of T2D PRS in non-European populations is critical for equitable deployment of PRS to clinical practice that benefits global populations.
Methods
We integrated T2D GWAS in European, African, and East Asian populations to construct a trans-ancestry T2D PRS using a newly developed Bayesian polygenic modeling method, and assessed the prediction accuracy of the PRS in the multi-ethnic Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) study (11,945 cases; 57,694 controls), four Black cohorts (5137 cases; 9657 controls), and the Taiwan Biobank (4570 cases; 84,996 controls). We additionally evaluated a post hoc ancestry adjustment method that can express the polygenic risk on the same scale across ancestrally diverse individuals and facilitate the clinical implementation of the PRS in prospective cohorts.
Results
The trans-ancestry PRS was significantly associated with T2D status across the ancestral groups examined. The top 2% of the PRS distribution can identify individuals with an approximately 2.5–4.5-fold of increase in T2D risk, which corresponds to the increased risk of T2D for first-degree relatives. The post hoc ancestry adjustment method eliminated major distributional differences in the PRS across ancestries without compromising its predictive performance.
Conclusions
By integrating T2D GWAS from multiple populations, we developed and validated a trans-ancestry PRS, and demonstrated its potential as a meaningful index of risk among diverse patients in clinical settings. Our efforts represent the first step towards the implementation of the T2D PRS into routine healthcare.
Funder
National Human Genome Research Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics (clinical),Genetics,Molecular Biology,Molecular Medicine
Reference54 articles.
1. Dietrich S, Jacobs S, Zheng J-S, Meidtner K, Schwingshackl L, Schulze MB. Gene-lifestyle interaction on risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. Obes Rev. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2019;20(11):1557–71. 2. Wang L, Li X, Wang Z, Bancks MP, Carnethon MR, Greenland P, et al. Trends in prevalence of diabetes and control of risk factors in diabetes among US adults, 1999-2018. JAMA. 2021;326(8):704–16. 3. Gregg EW, Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Barker LE, Albright AL, Williamson DF. Modeling the impact of prevention policies on future diabetes prevalence in the United States: 2010-2030. Popul Health Metr. 2013;11(1):18. 4. Menke A, Casagrande S, Geiss L, Cowie CC. Prevalence of and trends in diabetes among adults in the United States, 1988-2012. JAMA. 2015;314(10):1021–9. 5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report (2020).
Cited by
61 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|