Abstract
Abstract
Background
Among older adults, food insecurity is associated with poor health status and health outcomes; people living with dementia (PLWD) are at increased risk for insecurity. Approaches to addressing food insecurity among homebound older adults include two modes of home-delivered meals: (1) meals delivered daily to participants’ homes by a volunteer or paid driver who socializes with the client or (2) frozen meals that are mailed to participants’ homes. Research has not examined benefits of these meals for PLWD or their caregivers nor compared the effectiveness of these two approaches in reducing food insecurity. The objective of this study was to test the processes for recruiting and engaging in qualitative research with PLWD and caregivers in an effort to understand the context, implementation, and mechanisms of impact by which relationships between meal delivery and outcomes may be achieved in preparation for a larger, follow-on study.
Methods
This is a qualitative sub-study of a pilot, multisite, two-arm pragmatic feasibility trial comparing the effect of two modes of meal delivery on nursing home placement among 243 PLWD. In this sub-study, we tested recruitment and enrollment procedures and piloted interview guides among a subset of participants and caregivers.
Results
We recruited and conducted interviews with nine PLWD and seven caregivers. In testing the informed consent process, all participants were able to consent to be interviewed, and PLWD all demonstrated capacity to consent. We successfully used a cognitive screener to obtain scores of cognitive impairment for PLWD and observed scores indicating a broad range of function. Our interview guides successfully resulted in information about the context, implementation, and mechanisms of impact for meal delivery during the pilot.
Conclusions
In addition to establishing feasibility for the future trial, the substantive findings identified through the qualitative interviews provide an initial understanding of the contextual factors for meal delivery and the potential mechanisms of impact across meal delivery types that warrant further examination in a full-scale trial. Findings from our study provide crucial pilot data to support a follow-on trial to understand how to address food insecurity among PLWD.
Name of the registry
ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial registration
NCT04850781
Date of registration
April 20, 2021, retrospectively registered
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04850781
Funder
National Institute on Aging
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. Terrell K. Food insecurity leaves people over 60 hungry: AARP; 2019 Available from: https://www.aarp.org/politics-society/advocacy/info-2019/older-americans-food-insecure.html.
2. Frith E, Loprinzi PD. Food insecurity and cognitive function in older adults: Brief report. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(5):1765–8.
3. Gao X, Scott T, Falcon LM, Wilde PE, Tucker KL. Food insecurity and cognitive function in Puerto Rican adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(4):1197–203.
4. Koyanagi A, Veronese N, Stubbs B, Vancampfort D, Stickley A, Oh H, et al. Food insecurity is associated with mild cognitive impairment among middle-aged and older adults in South Africa: findings from a nationally representative survey. Nutrients. 2019;11(4):749.
5. Portela-Parra ET, Leung CW. Food insecurity is associated with lower cognitive functioning in a national sample of older adults. J Nutr. 2019;149(10):1812–7.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献