Abstract
AbstractBackgroundOptiBreech Care is a care pathway for breech presentation at term, including where chosen, physiological breech birth attended by professionals with advanced training and/or proficiency. We aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing OptiBreech team care prior to proceeding with a planned pilot randomised controlled trial.MethodsOur design was an observational implementation feasibility assessment across England and Wales, January 2021–June 2022. Our objectives were to determine whether Trusts could provide attendants with advanced training (implementation feasibility), who deliver protocol-consistent care (fidelity), within existing resources (costs), while maintaining low neonatal admission rates (safety) and adequate recruitment rates (trial feasibility). Participants included women > 37 weeks pregnant with a breech-presenting foetus, requesting support for a vaginal breech birth following standard counselling, and staff involved in the study. No randomisation occurred in this first stage of feasibility work.ResultsThirteen National Health Service sites were recruited. A total of 82 women planned births in the study. Sites with a breech specialist midwife recruited at double the rate of sites without (0.90/month, 95%CI0.64–1.16 vs 0.40, 95%CI0.12–0.68). Referrals into the study came from midwives (46%), obstetricians (34%) and women themselves (20%). Vaginal births were attended by staff with OptiBreech training at 87.5% (35/40, 95%CI0.732–0.958) and by staff who met additional proficiency criteria at 67.5% (27/40, 95%CI0.509–0.814). Fidelity criteria were more consistently met by staff who also met proficiency criteria. There were four neonatal admissions (4.9%, 4/82), including one serious adverse outcome (1.2%, 1/82).ConclusionsA prospective observational cohort of OptiBreech collaborative care, which could potentially support nested or cluster randomisation, appears feasible in sites willing to establish a dedicated clinic and strategically develop further proficient members of staff, with back-up plans for supporting rapidly progressing births. Randomisation procedures remain to be feasibility tested. It is funded by the NIHR (NIHR300582).
Funder
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Impey L, Murphy D, Griffiths M, Penna L, On behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of breech presentation. BJOG. 2017 Jun;124(7):e151–77. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14465
2. NHS Digital. NHS Maternity Statistics, 2018–2019. 2019. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-maternity-statistics/2018-19. [Cited 17 Jan 2020]
3. Lafitte AS, Dolley P, le Coutour X, Benoist G, Prime L, Thibon P, et al. Rate of caesarean sections according to the Robson classification: analysis in a French perinatal network–interest and limitations of the French medico-administrative data (PMSI). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018 Feb 1;47(2):39–44. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784717302519?via%3Dihub. [Cited 8 Jan 2019]
4. NICE. Caesarean section. NICE clinical guideline. London: National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health; 2011.
5. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R, West HM. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:CD000083. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000083.pub3.