Abstract
Abstract
Background
The growing population of patients over the age of 65 faces particular vulnerability following discharge after hospitalization or an emergency room visit. Specific areas of concern include a high risk for falls and poor comprehension of discharge instructions. Emergency medical technicians (EMTs), who frequently transport these patients home from the hospital, are uniquely positioned to aid in mitigating transition of care risks and are both trained and utilized to do so using the Transport PLUS intervention.
Methods
Existing literature and focus groups of various stakeholders were utilized to develop two checklists: the fall safety assessment (FSA) and the discharge comprehension assessment (DCA). EMTs were trained to administer the intervention to eligible patients in the geriatric population. Using data from the checklists, follow-up phone calls, and electronic health records, we measured the presence of hazards, removal of hazards, the presence of discharge comprehension issues, and correction or reinforcement of comprehension. These results were validated during home visits by community health workers (CHWs). Feasibility outcomes included patient acceptance of the Transport PLUS intervention and accuracy of the EMT assessment. Qualitative feedback via focus groups was also obtained. Clinical outcomes measured included 3-day and 30-day readmission or ED revisit.
Results
One-hundred three EMTs were trained to administer the intervention and participated in 439 patient encounters. The intervention was determined to be feasible, and patients were highly amenable to the intervention, as evidenced by a 92% and 74% acceptance rate of the DCA and FSA, respectively. The majority of patients also reported that they found the intervention helpful (90%) and self-reported removing 40% of fall hazards; 85% of such changes were validated by CHWs. Readmission/revisit rates are also reported.
Conclusions
The Transport PLUS intervention is a feasible, easily implemented tool in preventative community paramedicine with high levels of patient acceptance. Further study is merited to determine the effectiveness of the intervention in reducing rates of readmission or revisit. A randomized control trial has since begun utilizing the knowledge gained within this study.
Funder
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference19 articles.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2016 Emergency Department Summary Tables. CDC; 2016;1:4–4. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhamcs/web_tables/2016_ed_web_tables.pdf. Cited 2022 Aug 3.
2. Mather M, Jacobsen LA, Ard KMP. Population Bulletin. Popul Ref Bur. 2015;70.2:3. Available from: https://www.prb.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/population-bulletin-2015-70-2-aging-us.pdf. Cited 2022 Aug 3.
3. Hill A-M, Hoffmann T, McPhail S, Beer C, Hill KD, Oliver D, et al. Evaluation of the sustained effect of inpatient falls prevention education and predictors of falls after hospital discharge—follow-up to a randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol Ser A. 2011;66A:1001–12.
4. Munjal KG, Shastry S, Chapin H, Tan N, Misra A, Greenberg E, et al. Retrospective cohort study of rates of return emergency department visits among patients transported home by ambulance. J Emerg Med. 2020;59:147–52.
5. Important facts about falls | Home and recreational safety | CDC Injury Center. 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/falls/adultfalls.html. Cited 2021 Dec 5.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献