Abstract
Abstract
Background
Pain management is a major unmet need in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although many patients are treated with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDS), including biologic therapies, many people with RA continue to experience significant pain. We aimed to determine whether performing a comprehensive pain evaluation is feasible in people with active RA receiving conventional DMARDs and biologic therapies.
Methods
The BIORA-PAIN feasibility study was an open-label, randomised trial, which recruited participants suitable for treatment with biologic therapy. The primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment, randomisation and retention of eligible participants. All participants underwent pain assessment for nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic pain during the 12-month study period, with quarterly assessments for VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) pain, painDETECT and QST (quantitative sensory testing). This trial was registered in clinicaltrials.gov NCT04255134.
Results
During the study period, 93 participants were screened of whom 25 were eligible: 13 were randomised to adalimumab and 12 to abatacept. Participant recruitment was lower than expected due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Pain assessments were practical in the clinical trial setting. An improvement was observed for VAS pain from baseline over 12 months, with a mean (SEM) of 3.7 (0.82) in the abatacept group and 2.3 (1.1) in the adalimumab group. There was a reduction in painDETECT and improvement in QST measures in both treatment groups during the study. Participant feedback included that some of the questionnaire-based pain assessments were lengthy and overlapped in their content. Adverse events were similar in both groups. There was one death due to COVID-19.
Conclusions
This first-ever feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial assessing distinct modalities of pain in RA met its progression criteria. This study demonstrates that it is feasible to recruit and assess participants with active RA for specific modalities of pain, including nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic elements. Our data suggests that it is possible to stratify people for RA based on pain features. The differences in pain outcomes between abatacept and adalimumab treated groups warrant further investigation.
Trial registration
NCT04255134, Registered on Feb 5, 2020.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. NICE guideline: Rheumatoid arthritis in adults: management (NG100). Published July 2018; www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng100
2. McInnes IB, Schett G. Pathogenetic insights from the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2017;389(10086):2328–37.
3. Eberhard A, Bergman S, Mandl T, Olofsson T, Rydholm M, Jacobsson L, Turesson C. Predictors of u nacceptable pain with and without low inflammation over 5 years in early rheumatoid arthritis – an inception cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021;23(1):169.
4. Lee SY, Ibrahim F, Tom BDM, Nikiphorou E, Williams FMK, Lempp H, Scott DL. Baseline predictors of remission, pain and fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: the TITRATE trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021;23(1):278.
5. Blundell A, Sofat N. Which biologic therapies to treat rheumatoid arthritis and when? Eur Med J. 2021;6(3):101–10.