Pilot and feasibility studies: extending the conceptual framework

Author:

Bond ChristineORCID,Lancaster Gillian A.,Campbell Mike,Chan Claire,Eddy Saskia,Hopewell Sally,Mellor Katie,Thabane Lehana,Eldridge Sandra

Abstract

AbstractIn 2016, we published a conceptual framework outlining the conclusions of our work in defining pilot and feasibility studies. Since then, the CONSORT extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials has been published and there have been further developments in the pilot study landscape. In this paper, we revisit and extend our framework to incorporate the various feasibility pathways open to researchers, which include internal pilot studies. We consider, with examples, when different approaches to feasibility and pilot studies are more effective and efficient, taking into account the pragmatic decisions that may need to be made. The ethical issues involved in pilot studies are discussed. We end with a consideration of the funders’ perspective in making difficult resource decisions to include feasibility work and the policy implications of these; throughout, we provide examples of the uncertainties and compromises that researchers have to navigate to make progress in the most efficient way.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference43 articles.

1. Eldridge SM, Lancaster G, Campbell M, Thabane L, Hopewell S, Coleman C, et al. Defining feasibility and pilot studies in preparation for randomised controlled trials: using consensus methods and validation to develop a conceptual framework. PLOSONE. 2016;11(3):e0150205. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150205 March 15, 2016.

2. National Institute for Health Research. Guidance on applying for feasibility studies 2021. Updated 01/02/21. Available from: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/nihr-research-for-patient-benefit-rfpb-programme-guidance-on-applying-for-feasibility-studies/20474 Accessed 18/05/21

3. Health Research Board. Definitive Interventions and Feasibility Awards (DIFA) Guidance Notes 2020 Updated 25/05/20. Available from: https://www.hrb.ie/fileadmin/2._Plugin_related_files/Funding_schemes/DIFA_2020_Full_Application_Guidance_Notes.pdf Accessed 01/10/2020

4. Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(2):307–12.

5. Thabane L, et al. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:1.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3