Abstract
AbstractIn 2016, we published a conceptual framework outlining the conclusions of our work in defining pilot and feasibility studies. Since then, the CONSORT extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials has been published and there have been further developments in the pilot study landscape. In this paper, we revisit and extend our framework to incorporate the various feasibility pathways open to researchers, which include internal pilot studies. We consider, with examples, when different approaches to feasibility and pilot studies are more effective and efficient, taking into account the pragmatic decisions that may need to be made. The ethical issues involved in pilot studies are discussed. We end with a consideration of the funders’ perspective in making difficult resource decisions to include feasibility work and the policy implications of these; throughout, we provide examples of the uncertainties and compromises that researchers have to navigate to make progress in the most efficient way.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Eldridge SM, Lancaster G, Campbell M, Thabane L, Hopewell S, Coleman C, et al. Defining feasibility and pilot studies in preparation for randomised controlled trials: using consensus methods and validation to develop a conceptual framework. PLOSONE. 2016;11(3):e0150205. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150205 March 15, 2016.
2. National Institute for Health Research. Guidance on applying for feasibility studies 2021. Updated 01/02/21. Available from: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/nihr-research-for-patient-benefit-rfpb-programme-guidance-on-applying-for-feasibility-studies/20474 Accessed 18/05/21
3. Health Research Board. Definitive Interventions and Feasibility Awards (DIFA) Guidance Notes 2020 Updated 25/05/20. Available from: https://www.hrb.ie/fileadmin/2._Plugin_related_files/Funding_schemes/DIFA_2020_Full_Application_Guidance_Notes.pdf Accessed 01/10/2020
4. Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(2):307–12.
5. Thabane L, et al. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:1.