Participant comprehension and acceptability of enhanced versus text-only electronic informed consent: an innovative qualitative pilot study

Author:

Corneli AmyORCID,Starling Summer,Choi Yujung,Vosylius Jurgis,Madre Leanne,Mackinnon Andrew,Tenaerts Pamela

Abstract

Abstract Background The use of electronic informed consent (eIC) in decentralized trials offers a pragmatic approach to enrolling participants across multiple geographic areas. Methods Using a randomized, cross-over study design, we conducted a qualitative descriptive evaluation of two eIC approaches—text-only eIC and enhanced eIC—in a mock hypertension Phase III clinical trial. We assessed participant comprehension and acceptability (usability, satisfaction, and eIC preference). Results A total of 24 individuals with hypertension participated in the study: 12 reviewed the text-only eIC first, followed by the enhanced eIC, and 12 reviewed the enhanced eIC first, followed by the text-only eIC. The study population was diverse in gender, age, race, and geographic location. We found no descriptive differences in participant comprehension and satisfaction between the two eIC approaches. However, more participants preferred the enhanced eIC, and participants indicated that the digital elements were personable and made them feel more informed, engaged, comfortable, and prepared to participate in clinical research. Conclusions Our findings suggest that enhancing the eIC process with digital elements may have beneficial outcomes among potential participants beyond comprehension and satisfaction.

Funder

Medable

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference32 articles.

1. United States Code of Federal Regulations. Title 45 CFR, Part 46. Available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2018-06-19/pdf/2018-13187.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2023.

2. United States Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21 CFR, Part 50. Available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=50.20. Accessed 16 June 2023.

3. Grady C. Enduring and emerging challenges of informed consent. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(9):855–62. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1411250.

4. Montalvo W, Larson E. Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: a systematic review. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014;46(6):423–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12097.

5. Grady C, Cummings SR, Rowbotham MC, McConnell MV, Ashley EA, Kang G. Informed Consent. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(9):856–67. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1603773.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3