A balancing act: radicality and capture in institutionalising reflexive governance for urban sustainability transitions

Author:

de Geus TessaORCID,Wittmayer Julia M.,Silvestri Giorgia

Abstract

AbstractOver the past two decades, urban actors have sought to foster long-lasting change towards sustainability through reflexive governance. Related activities, including transition labs, arenas, experiments, and roadmaps, have been problematised for disparities between using a discourse of transformation and radicality while failing to materialise radical action and succumbing to ‘projectification’ – meaning that the impact of an intervention tends to evaporate after the initial experiment impulse. Enabling a transformative legacy of such interventions requires institutionalising reflexive governance arrangements, i.e. a process of integrating these arrangements as part of the existing institutional set-ups while maintaining ‘radical’ elements. Particularly as the focus in certain urban transitions shifts from emerging and supporting niche practices towards institutionalising new ways of working and breaking down regime structures, it becomes paramount to better understand such processes. Based on a comparative empirical analysis of six European cities, we explore how these cities attempt to institutionalise reflexive governance and take stock of the tensions encountered, particularly to what extent cities manage to safeguard their radical ambitions, or whether these become ‘captured’ in the process. Other highlighted tensions are a focus on internal dynamics, a struggle around voluntary structures and accountability, and a challenge of keeping momentum with new actor constellations while trying to address complexity and uncertainty. We conclude by putting forward three recommendations for how reflexive governance processes may increase their impact: through prioritising institutional embeddedness in and outside of the local authority; creating transparency around how governance arrangements are adjusted and modified throughout the process for accountability; and renewing commitment periodically to ensure continuity and commitment from actors involved.

Funder

HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference73 articles.

1. ABMEE (2022) Brasov Roadmap. https://www.citiesoftomorrow.eu/sites/default/files/documents/ROADMAP_BRASOV_SD_FINAL.compressed.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2023.

2. Ajuntament de València & València Clima I Energia (2022) Fair and Inclusive Energy Transition Strategy - Valencia 2030. https://www.citiesoftomorrow.eu/sites/default/files/documents/ROADMAP_VALENCIA_SD_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2022.

3. Arenas D, Strumińska-Kutra M, Landoni P. Walking the tightrope and stirring things up: Exploring the institutional work of sustainable entrepreneurs. Bus Strateg Environ. 2020;29:3055–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.2557.

4. Arts B, Leroy P. Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006.

5. Avelino F. Theories of power and social change. Power contestations and their implications for research on social change and innovation. J Polit Power. 2021;00:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1875307.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3