Author:
Lechl Michael,Schoppik Luis,de Meer Hermann
Abstract
AbstractFlexibility potentials are mostly provided by centrally coordinated flexibility resources such as natural-gas-fired power plants. However, the decentralization of power generation combined with the decarbonization of the sector due to the energy transition requires the exploration of new types of flexibility resources. In particular, to reduce dependence on natural-gas-fired power plants, it would be desirable to replace them with alternative flexibility resources. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to analyze, using Germany as an example, to what extent the flexibility potential of already existing battery storage systems can replace the flexibility potential of natural-gas-fired power plants. The methodology used is based on a multi-time-scale flexibility model together with an approach for temporal aggregation of flexibility potentials and two approaches for spatial aggregation of flexibility potentials. Based on the methodology and an analysis of publicly available data, a comprehensive potential analysis is carried out. This analysis shows, among others, that existing battery storage systems have a promising potential to replace a considerable number of natural-gas-fired power plants in Germany in terms of their flexibility potentials.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Information Systems
Reference28 articles.
1. Abudu K, Igie U, Minervino O, Hamilton R (2021) Gas turbine efficiency and ramp rate improvement through compressed air injection. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A: J Power Energy 235(4):866–884
2. BDEW (2022) Gross electricity generation from renewable energy in Germany from 1990 to 2022 (in terawatt hours) [Graph]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/583179/gross-electricity-generation-from-renewable-energy-germany/
3. Boots B, Sugihara K, Chiu SN, Okabe A (2009) Spatial tessellations: concepts and applications of voronoi diagrams
4. Bucher MA, Chatzivasileiadis S, Andersson G (2015a) Managing flexibility in multi-area power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 31(2):1218–1226
5. Bucher MA, Delikaraoglou S, Heussen K, Pinson P, Andersson G (2015b) On quantification of flexibility in power systems. In: 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech, pp. 1–6