Author:
Dong Xiang-hui,Huang Xiang-hui,Chen Ming,Chang Yan-Hai,Ling Ming,Yang Bo
Abstract
Abstract
Background
There is a paucity of data concerning the morphological differences of resected distal femurs and proximal tibias in osteoarthritic (OA) and normal knees. The objective of this study was to determine whether morphometric differences in the surfaces of resected distal femurs and proximal tibias exist between OA and normal knees in a Chinese population.
Methods
Ninety-four OA knees and ninety-five normal knees were evaluated in Chinese individuals. Computed tomography was used to measure the femoral mediolateral (fML), medial anteroposterior (fMAP), lateral anteroposterior (fLAP), medial condylar width (fMCW), lateral condylar width (fLCW), medial posterior condylar curvature radii (fMCR), lateral posterior condyle curvature radii (fLCR), fML/fMAP aspect ratio, tibial mediolateral (tML), middle anteroposterior (tAP), medial anteroposterior (tMAP), and lateral anteroposterior (tLAP) tML/tMAP aspect ratio to determine the morphologic differences between OA and normal knees.
Results
The average fMCW and tMAP dimensions of OA knees were larger than those of normal knees in both male and female (p <0.05). The fMAP/fML aspect ratio and tMAP/tML aspect ratio were also significantly different in both sexs (p <0.05). OA knees have an oval-shaped distal femur with a wider ML length and more spherical-shaped proximal tibiae with relatively narrow ML dimensions.
Conclusions
The study revealed the morphological differences in fMCW, tMAP, fMAP/fML and tMAP/tML between OA and normal knees in both males and females. These findings may provide guidelines that can be used to design better knee implants that are more size-matched for OA knees.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Rheumatology
Reference29 articles.
1. Meier M, Zingde S, Steinert A, Kurtz W, Koeck F, Beckmann J. What is the possible impact of high variability of distal femoral geometry on TKA? A CT data analysis of 24042 knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019;477(3):561–70.
2. Lu F, Sun X, Wang W, Zhang Q, Guo W. Anthropometry of the medial femoral condyle in the Chinese population: the morphometric analysis to design unicomparmental knee component. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):95.
3. Katchy AU, Agu AU, Esom E, Ikele IT, Okeke MA, Ugwu AU. The morphometric analysis of the male cadaveric native knees of the ethnic igbos of South East Nigeria and its implication in total knee replacement. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020;23(7):1013–21.
4. Zhang YJ, Chen YX, Qiang MF, Zhang K, Li HB, Jiang YC, et al. Morphometry of the tibial plateau at the surface and resected levels. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(8):2563–7.
5. Karimi E, Zandi R, Norouzian M, Birjandinejad A. Correlation of anthropometric measurements of proximal tibia in iranian knees with size of current tibial implants. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019;7(4):339–45.