Author:
Xiao Dan,Gong Maoqi,Chen Chen,Zha Yejun,Li Ting,Ji Shangwei,Hua Kehan,Sun Weitong,Jiang Xieyuan
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of combined medial-lateral approach open arthrolysis with and without hinged external fixation.
Methods
We retrospectively collected and analyzed the clinical data of patients with severe elbow stiffness who were treated in our institution from January 2018 to January 2019. All of them were treated with combined medial-lateral approach arthrolysis. There were 20 patients who had the hinged external fixation placed and 29 patients without the placement of the external fixation. Their baseline characteristics and functional outcomes were evaluated and compared.
Results
The average follow-up time was 28.4 ± 3.7 months. There were no significant differences in the ROM of the elbow, MEPS, VAS, DASH, or complications between the two groups. The operation time and treatment cost of the patients without external fixation were significantly lower than patients with external fixation.
Conclusion
Combined medial-lateral approach open elbow arthrolysis without external fixation is a safe and effective way to treat elbow stiffness.
Level of evidence
Therapeutic Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Rheumatology