Author:
Sharma Rachit,Chaudhary Narendra Kumar,Karki Mandeep,Sunuwar Dev Ram,Singh Devendra Raj,Pradhan Pranil Man Singh,Gyawali Prakash,Duwal Shrestha Sailendra Kumar,Bhandari Kailash Kumar
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Plantar fasciitis (PF) is a common orthopaedic problem, with heel pain worsening the quality of life. Although steroid injection is often used if the conservative treatment fails, Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) injection is gaining popularity due to its safety and long-lasting effect. However, the effect of PRP versus steroid injection in PF has not been studied yet in Nepal. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effect of PRP compared with steroid injection in the treatment of PF.
Methods
This study was a single-center, hospital-based, open-label, parallel-group randomized clinical trial to compare the effect of PRP injection with steroid injection in plantar fasciitis between August 2020 and March 2022. A total of 90 randomly selected participants aged 18 to 60 years suffering from plantar fasciitis with failed conservative treatment were intervened. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scoring system were used to evaluate functional mobility and pain before and after the intervention for three and six months, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using a Student’s two-sample t-test. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
The PRP injection showed a better outcome than the steroid injection in six months follow-up. The mean (± SD) VAS score was significantly decreased in the PRP group (1.97 + 1.13) than in the steroid group (2.71 ± 0.94) with the group difference of -0.73 (95% CI: -1.18 to -0.28) at six months. Similarly, there was a significant increase in the AOFAS scores in the PRP group (86.04 ± 7.45) compared to the steroid group (81.23 ± 9.60) at six months of follow-up with a group difference of 4.80 (95% CI: 1.15 to 8.45). There was also a significant reduction of plantar fascia thickness in the PRP group compared to that of the steroid group (3.53 ± 0.81 versus 4.58 ± 1.02) at six months of follow-up with the group difference of -1.04 (95% CI: -1.44 to -0.65).
Conclusion
The PRP injection showed better outcomes than steroid injection in plantar fasciitis treatment over the course of six months. Further research with a larger population and longer follow-up than six months is needed to generalize the findings and their long-term efficacy.
Trial registration
NCT04985396. First registered on 02 August 2021. (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04985396)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Rheumatology
Reference99 articles.
1. Schwartz EN, Su J. Plantar fasciitis: a concise review. Perm J. 2014;18.
2. Alanazi M, Khan R, Muqri A, Alnosaier Z, Dalak M, Alajlani S, et al. Plantar fasciitis in primary care: a review. Int J Med Dev Ctries. 2022;6(7):1002–5.
3. Luffy L, Grosel J, Thomas R, So E. Plantar fasciitis: a review of treatments. J Am Acad Physician Assist. 2018;31:20–4.
4. Chen CM, Lee M, Lin CH, Chang CH, Lin CH. Comparative efficacy of corticosteroid injection and non-invasive treatments for plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8.
5. Todros S, Biz C, Ruggieri P, Pavan PG. Experimental analysis of plantar fascia mechanical properties in subjects with foot pathologies. Appl Sci. 2021;11:1–11.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献