Author:
Wu Wence,Zhang Xinxin,Li Xiaoyang,Yu Shengji
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the influence of diverse bone cement distribution patterns in patients with metastatic vertebral lesions after bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP).
Methods
Fifty-nine patients with single-level metastatic vertebral lesions who received bilateral PKP were retrospectively reviewed. According to the different bone cement distribution patterns, patients were divided into confluent (n = 35, CF) and separated (n = 24, SP) groups. Indicators including visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), vertebral body height (VBH) variation, quality of life (QoL), and related complications were reviewed and compared between the two groups.
Results
No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in age, sex, types of lesions, locations of lesions, posterior vertebral body and/or pedicle involvement, percentage of vertebral invasion, procedure duration or cement volume (p > 0.05). There was significant improvement in VAS, ODI, VBH and QoL at any follow-up examination (p < 0.05) compared with those preoperatively. The CF group exhibited better pain relief in VAS scores than did the SP group just at 3 days and 1 month after PKP (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in VAS scores at 3 months or 1 year after PKP (p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of ODI, VBH or QoL (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusions
More rapid pain relief was achieved with confluent rather than separated bone cement distribution patterns in PKP for patients with metastatic vertebral lesions.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Capital Characterized Clinical Application Research Fund of Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission of China
CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Rheumatology
Reference24 articles.
1. McConnell CT Jr, Wippold FJ 2nd, Ray CE Jr, Weissman BN, Angevine PD, Fries IB, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria management of vertebral compression fractures. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014;11(8):757–63.
2. Lv B, Ji P, Fan X, Yuan J, Xu T, Yao X, et al. Clinical Efficacy of Different Bone Cement Distribution Patterns in Percutaneous Kyphoplasty: A Retrospective Study. Pain Physician. 2020;23(4):e409-409E416.
3. Lin WC, Lu CH, Chen HL, Wang HC, Yu CY, Wu RW, et al. The impact of preoperative magnetic resonance images on outcome of cemented vertebrae. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(11):1899–906.
4. Lin J, Qian L, Jiang C, Chen X, Feng F, Lao L. Bone cement distribution is a potential predictor to the reconstructive effects of unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty in OVCFs: a retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):140.
5. He X, Li H, Meng Y, Huang Y, Hao DJ, Wu Q, et al. Percutaneous Kyphoplasty Evaluated by Cement Volume and Distribution: An Analysis of Clinical Data. Pain Physician. 2016;19(7):495–506.