Abstract
Abstract
Background
To compare changes in the composition of paraspinal muscles of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and matched healthy controls using T2 mapping and T2 IDEAL and correlate the quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) results with clinical assessments of AS patients.
Method
In total, 37 AS patients and 37 healthy controls were enrolled in the case control study. T2 mapping with and without fat saturation and IDEAL imaging were used to assess the multifidus (MF) and erector spinae (ES) at the levels of L3/L4 and L4/L5 for all subjects. Mean T2non-fatsat, T2fat, T2fatsat, cross-sectional area (CSA), and fat fraction (FF) were compared between AS and healthy controls. Correlations of qMRI results with clinical assessments were analyzed in AS.
Results
Significantly elevated mean T2non-fatsat values and the FF of the MF and ES at both levels were observed in AS and compared to the controls (p < 0.05). The mean T2fatsat values of ES and MF were significantly higher only at the level of L3/L4 in AS compared to healthy controls (p < 0.05). A loss of muscle CSA compatible with atrophy was present in MF and ES at both levels in AS compared to the controls (p < 0.05). Weak to moderate positive correlations were found between FF and age and disease duration in AS (r = 0.318–0.415, p < 0.05). However, such positive correlation was not observed between FF and disease duration after adjusting for age (p > 0.05).
Conclusions
Our findings indicate that using a combination of IDEAL and T2 mapping may provide deeper insights into the pathophysiological degeneration of paraspinal muscles in AS.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Rheumatology
Reference48 articles.
1. Hwang MC, Ridley L, Reveille JD. Ankylosing spondylitis risk factors: a systematic literature review. Clin Rheumatol. 2021;40:3079–93.
2. Van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis: a proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27:361–8.
3. Salaffi F, Carotti M, Garofalo G, Giuseppetti GM, Grassi W. Radiological scoring methods for ankylosing spondylitis: a comparison between the bath ankylosing spondylitis radiology index and the modified stoke ankylosing spondylitis spine score. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25:67–74.
4. Sahin N, Ozcan E, Baskent A, Karan A, Kasikcioglu E. Muscular kinetics and fatigue evaluation of knee using by isokinetic dynamometer in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Acta Reumatol Port. 2011;36:252–9.
5. El MA, Ebo’O FB, Sadni S, Majjad A, Hamza T, Mounach A. Is there a relation between pre-sarcopenia, sarcopenia, cachexia and osteoporosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:268.