Effective screening methods to prevent surgical site infections in orthopedic surgery: an observational study

Abstract

Abstract Background The bacterial source of surgical-site infections (SSIs) can have either endogenous and/or exogenous origins, and some studies have revealed that endogenous transmission is an important pathway for SSIs in orthopedic surgery. However, since the frequency of SSIs is low (0.5–4.7%), screening all surgery patients is labor-intensive and cost-prohibitive. The goal of this study was to better understand how to improve the efficacy of nasal culture screening in preventing SSIs. Methods Nasal cultures for 1616 operative patients over a 3-year period were evaluated for the presence of nasal bacterial microbiota and the species identity. We also investigated the medical factors that influence colonization and evaluated the ratio of agreement between nasal cultures and SSI-causing bacteria. Results In a survey of 1616 surgical cases, 1395 (86%) were normal microbiota (NM), 190 (12%) were MSSA carriers, and 31 (2%) were MRSA carriers. The risk factors for MRSA carriers were significantly higher than the NM group in patients with a history of hospitalization (13 [41.9%], p = 0.015), patients who had been admitted to a nursing facility (4 [12.9%], p = 0.005), and patients who were > 75 years of age (19 [61.3%], p = 0.021). The incidence of SSIs was significantly higher in the MSSA group (17/190 [8.4%]) than the NM group (10/1395 [0.7%], p = 0.00). The incidence of SSIs in the MRSA group (1/31 [3.2%]) tended to be higher than that in the NM group, but there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.114). The concordance rate between causative bacteria of SSI and species present in nasal cultures was 53% (13/25 cases). Conclusions The results of our study suggest screening patients with a history of past hospitalization, a history of admission in a long-term care facility, and older than 75 to reduce SSIs. Trial registration This study was approved by the institutional review board of the authors’ affiliated institutions (the ethics committee of Sanmu Medical Center, 2016-02).