Author:
Guo Xinhu,Guo Zhaoqing,Li Weishi,Chen Zhongqiang,Zeng Yan,Zhong Woquan,Li Zihe
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Dysplastic spondylolisthesis is a rare spinal deformity that occurs mainly in young patients. Although its sagittal parameters had been well stated, coronal abnormalities in these patients were poorly studied. The purposes of this study were: (1) to investigate the prevalence of scoliosis in dysplastic spondylolisthesis;(2) to assess scoliosis resolution or persistence after surgery; and (3) to propose a modified classification of scoliosis associated with dysplastic spondylolisthesis.
Methods
Fifty patients (average age 14.9 ± 5.6 years) diagnosed with dysplastic spondylolisthesis who underwent surgical treatment were followed up and their data were analyzed. Standing posteroanterior and lateral full spine radiographs were used to measure the coronal and sagittal parameters. Patients with scoliosis, which was defined as a coronal Cobb angle greater than 10°, were divided into three groups according to their curve characteristics: “independent” scoliosis (IS) group, spasm scoliosis (SS) group, and olisthetic scoliosis (OS) group. SS and OS were spondylolisthesis-induced scoliosis. The radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcomes were collected before and after surgery and compared between groups.
Results
The average slip percentage was 62.8% ± 23.1% and the average follow-up time was 51.5 ± 36.4 months (range 3–168 months). Twenty-eight of the 50 (56%) dysplastic spondylolisthesis patients showed scoliosis, of which 8 were IS (24.7° ± 15.2°), 11 were SS (13.9° ± 3.0°), and 9 were OS (12.9° ± 1.9°). By the last follow-up, no scoliosis resolution was observed in the IS group whereas all SS patients were relieved. Of the nine patients with OS, four (44.4%) had scoliosis resolution after surgery.
Conclusion
Distinguishing different types of scoliosis in dysplastic spondylolisthesis patients may help surgeons to plan treatment and understand prognosis. For patients with significant scoliosis, whether “independent” or spondylolisthesis-induced, treatment of spondylolisthesis should be performed first and scoliosis should be observed for a period of time and treated according to the corresponding principles.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Rheumatology
Reference20 articles.
1. Rahman RK, Perra J, Weidenbaum M. Wiltse and Marchetti/Bartolozzi classification of spondylolisthesis - guidelines for treatment. In: Bridwell KH, Dewald RL, editors. The Textbook of Spinal Surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Wilkins; 2011. p. 596–562.
2. Hoel RJ, Brenner RM, Polly DW Jr. The Challenge of Creating Lordosis in High-Grade Dysplastic Spondylolisthesis. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018;29:375–87.
3. Longo UG, Loppini M, Romeo G, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Evidence-based surgical management of spondylolisthesis: reduction or arthrodesis in situ. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:53–8.
4. Mac-Thiong JM, Hresko MT, Alzakri A, Parent S, Sucato DJ, Lenke LG, et al. Criteria for surgical reduction in high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis based on quality of life measures. Eur Spine J. 2019;28:2060–9.
5. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Chopin D, Berthonnaud E, Hresko T, O’Brien M. Spino-pelvic Alignment After Surgical Correction for Developmental Spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:1170–6.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献