Manual handling of heavy loads and low back pain among different occupational groups: results of the 2018 BIBB/BAuA employment survey

Author:

Sauter Martha,Barthelme Julia,Müller Charlotte,Liebers FalkORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background In Germany and other European countries, many occupations still involve manual handling of loads (MHL), an activity that puts the musculoskeletal system at risk of low back pain (LBP). This study aims to describe the current prevalence of MHL in different occupational groups stratified by gender in Germany, the association between MHL and LBP and the adjusted prevalence of LBP in different respond-categories of MHL. Methods Data was collected in telephone interviews conducted as part of the 2018 BIBB/BAuA Employment Survey, which covers work-related topics like working conditions, education, health status and job satisfaction. The analyses were limited to full-time workers (> 35 h/week) aged between 15 and 67. The frequency of MHL was analysed descriptively. BLOSSFELD classification was used to group the participants in occupational categories. The analysis of the association between MHL and the prevalence of LBP over the last 12 months was based on robust log-linear Poisson regression that results in prevalence ratios (PR). The main regression model was adjusted for gender, age, working hours, and working conditions. Adjusted estimates for the prevalence of LBP were calculated based on regression analysis. Results The sample consists of n = 14,331 participants (men: n = 8828, 61.6%; women: n = 5503, 38.4%; median age 49 years). Of these, 52.8% say they were exposed to MHL at work. MHL is most common in agricultural occupations, skilled and unskilled occupations. In the regression model, participants who said they were “often” exposed to MHL reported more frequently LBP than those participants who said they were “never” exposed to MHL. The PR as estimate for the association is 1.41 (95%CI [1.32; 1.49]). Postestimation of the prevalence of LBP began with 47.3% (95%CI [43.8%; 51.1%]) for participants who said they were “never” exposed to MHL and rose to 66.5% (95%CI [62.4%; 71.0%]) for participants who indicated they were “often” exposed to MHL. Conclusions The 2018 BIBB/BAuA Employment Survey emphasizes that MHL is still common in the German workforce and shows a significant association to LBP. Prevention policies for avoiding MHL remain vital.

Funder

Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (BAuA)

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Rheumatology

Reference42 articles.

1. Latza U, Liebers F, Franke F. Körperliche Beanspruchung und physische Belastungen bei der Arbeit – ein abnehmendes public health-problem? [physical strain and workload - a disappearing public health problem?]. Public Health Forum. 2013;21:12–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phf.2013.03.011.

2. BAuA. Ratgeber zur Gefährdungsbeurteilung-Handbuch - Gefährdungsfaktoren [Guidebook for Risk Assessement - Handbook - Riskfaktors]. vol. 3rd. Dortmund: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (BAuA); 2016. https://www.baua.de/EN/Topics/Work-design/Risk-assessment/Expert-knowledge/Expert-knowledge_node.html (02.09.2021).

3. Crawford JO, Davis A. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: why are they still so prevalent? Evidence from a literature review - European Risk Observatory Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work; 2020. https://osha.europa.eu/de/publications/work-related-musculoskeletal-disorders-why-are-they-still-so-prevalent-evidence (02.09.2021).

4. LasthandhabV. Manual Handling of Loads Ordinance of 4 December 1996 (Federal Law Gazette I p. 1841,1842), as last amended by Article 5, paragraph 4 of the Ordinance of 18 October 2017 (Federal Law Gazette I p. 3584). In.; 1996. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_lasthandhabv/englisch_lasthandhabv.html (02.09.2021).

5. da Costa BR, Vieira ER. Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. Am J Ind Med. 2010;53:285–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20750.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3