Online consultation in an orthopedic trauma surgery outpatient clinic: is there a learning curve?

Author:

Hepp Pierre,Osterhoff Georg,Melcher Peter,Henkelmann Ralf,Theopold JanORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background In the context of the German contact restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic of March 2020, an online-based consultation system was established in our university orthopedic outpatient department to maintain patient care. As a basis for contact-minimizing communication, this was continued after the contact restrictions were lifted. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to assess the effectiveness, technical feasibility, and patient flow in this system under lockdown conditions and in the period afterwards. Methods The evaluation took place from the beginning of the first lockdown on March 13, 2020, until May 31, 2021. For each patient encounter, the quality of the sound and video connections was documented. The outcomes of the consultations were recorded. Four categories were distinguished: 1) no follow-up necessary, 2) follow-up via online consultation, 3) referral for surgical therapy, and 4) follow-up in the outpatient clinic for physical examination. A comparison was made between an early cohort right after implementation of the online consultation and and a late cohort after establishment of the consultation. Results There were 408 patient encounters via online consultation. A total of 360 (88%) consultations were uninterrupted. Initial presentations accounted for 124 (30%) consultations. In 75 (18%) patients, no further follow-up was necessary. Follow-up via online consultation was scheduled in 82 (20%) patients, direct referral for surgery was made in 86 (21%) patients, and a follow-up for physical examination was arranged in 165 (40%) patients. When comparing the early and late cohort, there was no difference in the duration of the conversation (p = 0.23). A significant difference was found in the type of further treatment. In the late cohort, conservative therapy was used more often (p < 0.01), resulting in a lower number of follow-up visits for clinical examination (p < 0.01). Conclusion While a definite decision for further procedure was possible solely by online consultation in a large percentage of cases, 40% of patients still needed an additional in-person consultation for physical examination. A learning curve could be observed regarding the selection of patients suited for online consultation. Overall, online consultation is a useful measure to manage patient volume and to visibly support direct doctor-patient contact.

Funder

Universitätsklinikum Leipzig

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Rheumatology

Reference31 articles.

1. The federal government; Chancellor's meeting with state leaders. Home page. [Die Bundesregierung; Besprechung der Bundeskanzlerin mit den Länderchefs. Startseite.] https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/themen/coronavirus/beschluss-zu-corona-1730292. Accessed 23 Apr 2020.

2. Saxon state government; − Coronavirus in Saxony - sachsen.de. [Sächsische Staatsregierung; − Coronavirus in Sachsen - sachsen.de.] https://www.coronavirus.sachsen.de/index.html. Accessed 23 Apr 2020.

3. Saxon State Ministry for Social Affairs and Social Cohesion; Version-RV-SaechsCoronaSchVO_31032020.pdf. [Sächsischen Staatsministeriums für Soziales und Gesellschaftlichen Zusammenhalt; Fassung-RV-SaechsCoronaSchVO_31032020.pdf.] https://www.coronavirus.sachsen.de/download/Fassung-RV-SaechsCoronaSchVO_31032020.pdf. Accessed 23 Apr 2020.

4. AAOS, American College of Surgeons. Clinical issues and guidance. American College of Surgeons. https://www.facs.org/covid-19/clinical-guidance. Accessed 23 Apr 2020.

5. DGOU.e.V. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie; Recommendations for handling accidental injuries and surgical indications. [Empfehlungen für den Umgang mit Unfallverletzten und OP-Indikationen.] https://dgou.de/news/news/detailansicht/artikel/empfehlungen-fuer-den-umgang-mit-unfallverletzten-und-op-indikationen-1/ Accessed 23 Apr 2020.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3