Standardized Tip-Apex Distance (STAD): a modified individualized measurement of cephalic fixator position based on its own femoral head diameter in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with internal fixation

Abstract

Abstract Objective To design a standardized Tip-Apex Distance (STAD) and analyze the clinical significance of STAD in predicting cut-out in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures with internal fixation. Methods Firstly, we designed STAD according to the rule of TAD. We measured the STAD individually based on its own femoral head diameter (iFHD) instead of the known diameter of the lag screw in calculating TAD, resulting in that the STAD is simply the relative quantitation relationship of iFHD (the times of iFHD). In this study, we assumed that all the iFHD was 6D (1iFHD = 6D, or 1D = 1/6 of iFHD) in order for complete match of the Cleveland zone system, easy comparison of the STAD, and convenient identification for artificial intelligence. Secondly, we calculated and recorded all the STAD of cephalic fixator in 123 eligible ITF patients. Thirdly, we grouped all the ITF patients into the Failure and Non-failure groups according to whether cut-out or not, and analyzed the correlation between the cut-out and the STAD. Results Cleveland zone, Parker’s ratio (AP), TAD, and STAD were associated with the cut-out in univariate analysis. However, only STAD was the independent predictor of the cut-out by multivariate analysis. No cut-out was observed when STAD ≤ 2D (1/3 of iFHD). The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that STAD was a reliable predictor of cut-out, and the best cut-off value of STAD was 2.92D. Cut-out rate increased dramatically when STAD increased, especially when STAD > 3D (1/2 of iFHD). Conclusion Essentially, the STAD is a relative quantitation relationship of iFHD. The STAD is a reliable measurement of cephalic fixator position in predicting cut-out in geriatric ITF patients with single-screw cephalomedullary nail fixations. For avoiding cut-out, the STAD should be no more than a half of iFHD. Level of evidence Level III, Prognostic Study