Author:
Reis Betania Roqueto,Vasconcelos Ana Luisa Soares,Silva Antonio Marcos Miranda,Andreote Fernando Dini,Azevedo Antonio Carlos
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The use of rock powders in soil has emerged as a nature-based technology to improve soil properties relevant to crop development and for atmospheric carbon dioxide removal (CDR) via enhanced rock weathering (ERW). Although modeling this process is crucial, the soil microbiome has been identified as the main reason why several experimental and field results do not fit the geochemical and kinetic theoretical models. Here, the hypothesis that the bacterial community structure is modulated by the application of different silicate rock powders was tested. One phonolite, three basalt variations and one granite, as well as KCl treatments, were applied to a Ferralsol cultivated with Brachiaria in short-term pedogeochemical experiments and assessed after 1 (1M), 4 (4M) and 8 (8M) months.
Results
The main changes in soil bacterial structure were observed at 8M and found to be modulated according to rock type, with petrochemistry and mineralogy acting as the main drivers. The content of microbial biomass carbon tended to decrease over time in the Control and KCl treatments, especially at 4M, while the rock treatments showed constant behavior. The sampling time and treatment affected the richness and diversity indices. The Si, Ca and Fe from mafic minerals were the main chemical elements related to the soil bacterial changes at 8M.
Conclusions
The type (acidity) of silicate rock powder modulated the soil bacterial community (SBC) in a pot experiment with tropical soil. The specificity of the SBC for each rock type increased with time until the end of the experiment at 8 months (8M). The carbon content in the microbial biomass was lower in the rock powder treatments in the first month (1 M) than in the control and KCl treatments and was equal to or higher than that in the 8 M treatment. This result illustrates the challenge of modeling rock powder dissolution in soil since the soil medium is not inert but changes concurrently with the dissolution of the rock.
Graphical Abstract
Funder
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference77 articles.
1. Harley AD, Gilkes RJ. Factors influencing the release of plant nutrient elements from silicate rock powders: a geochemical overview. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems. 2000;56:11–36.
2. van Straaten P. AGROGEOLOGY: the use of rocks for crops. Cambridge: Enviroquest Ltd.; 2007.
3. Manning DAC, Theodoro SH. Enabling food security through use of local rocks and minerals. Extr Ind Soc. 2020;7:480–7.
4. Swoboda P, Döring TF, Hamer M. Remineralizing soils? The agricultural usage of silicate rock powders: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2022;807: 150976.
5. Samuels T, Bryce C, Landenmark H, Marie-Loudon C, Nicholson N, Stevens AH, et al. Microbial Weathering of Minerals and Rocks in Natural Environments. In: John Wiley & Sons I, editor. Biogeochem Cycles Ecol Drivers Environ Impact. 1st ed. 2020. p. 59–79.