Abstract
Abstract
Background
Traditional agriculture is on the front line of climate change, being most impacted by the increase in the intensity and frequency of extreme events, such as floods, drought and rising temperatures. Local ecological knowledge is a recognized keystone of successfully managed socioecological systems, but loss of soil fertility, water scarcity, incidence of diseases and decreased production due to climate change are linked to the greater vulnerability experienced by traditional farmers. Plant biostimulants are natural products used to stimulate nutrient uptake and efficiency by crops, increase tolerance to abiotic/biotic stress and improve quality without negative impacts on the environment if obtained from renewed sources. Humic substances are some of the most used plant biostimulants in agriculture and play a central role in plant adaptation.
Materials and methods
We reviewed and discussed a sample set of papers (n = 52) about humic substances to mitigate abiotic stress in crops using data basis from Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), Scopus—IBM (International Business Machines Corporation), and Scielo (Scientific Electronic Library Online).
Results
The predominance of authors in the global south is notable, but it is not a coincidence, since this is where the effects of climate change will have the greatest impact. The mechanisms involved in the stress mitigation involve the activation of signaling factors, gene response induction, the accumulation of osmoprotective and anti-oxidant compounds, the induction of antioxidative metabolism, ion homeostasis, membrane transport and adjustment of hormonal balance. The intriguing question is: how can a complex mixture of molecules affect so many distinct effects on plants responsible for plant adaptation?
Conclusions
The complexity of humic substances challenges our knowledge method, but supramolecular chemistry may provide answers that enable us to broaden our understanding of the plant defense mechanisms modulated by these substances.
Graphical Abstract
Funder
Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) Cientista do Nosso Estado programme.
Ministry of Science and Technology of Brazil
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference147 articles.
1. IFAD-International Fund for Agricultural Development. Smallholders, food security and the environment. 2013. https://www.ifad.org/documents/38714170/39135645/smallholders_report.pdf/>. Accessed 20 Sep 2023.
2. Soubry B, Sherren K, Thornton T. Are we taking farmers seriously? a review of the literature on farmer perceptions and climate change, 2007–2018. J Rural Stud. 2020;74:210–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.09.005.
3. IPCC—Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate change 2014 synthesis report, 2014. Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva: IPCC; 2014. p. 151.
4. Rede PENSSAN II Inquérito nacional sobre insegurança alimentar no contexto da pandemia da covid-19 no Brasil. 2022. https://olheparaafome.com.br. Accessed 29 Dec 2023.
5. Zandalinas SI, Fritschi FB, Mittler R. Global warming, climate change, and environmental pollution: recipe for a multifactorial stress combination disaster. Trend Plant Sci. 2021;26:588–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2021.02.011.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献