Author:
Dahlberg Caroline Lund,King-Smith Christina,Riggs Blake
Abstract
AbstractScientists who are interested in building research programs at primarily-undergraduate institutions (PUIs) have unique considerations compared to colleagues at research-intensive (R1) institutions. Maintaining a research program at a PUI holds unique challenges that should be considered before prospective faculty go on the job market, as they negotiate a job offer, and after they begin a new position. In this article we describe some of the considerations that aspiring and newly hired faculty should keep in mind as they plan out how they will set up a laboratory as a new Principle Investigator (PI) at a PUI.Anyone hoping to start a research program at a PUI should understand both the timeframe of interviews, job offers, and negotiations and the challenges and rewards of working with undergraduate researchers. Once a job is offered, candidates should be aware of the range of negotiable terms that can be part of a start-up package. Space and equipment considerations are also important, and making the most of shared spaces, existing infrastructure, and deals can extend the purchasing power of start-up funds as a new PIs builds their lab. PUIs’ focus on undergraduate education and mentorship leads to important opportunities for collaboration, funding, and bringing research projects directly into undergraduate teaching laboratories.A major focus of any new laboratory leader must be on building a productive, equitable, and supportive laboratory community. Equitable onboarding, mentorship plans, and formalized expectations, can all help build a productive and sustainable laboratory research program. However, important considerations about safety, inclusion, student schedules, and a PI’s own professional commitments are also extremely important concerns when working with undergraduates in research. A successful research program at a PUI will bring students into meaningful scientific inquiry and requires insights and skills that are often not the focus of scientific training. This article aims to describe the scope of setting up a new laboratory as a way to alleviate some of the burden that new and prospective faculty often feel.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine
Reference36 articles.
1. Estrada M, Burnett M, Campbell AG, et al. Improving Underrepresented Minority Student Persistence in STEM. LSE. 2016;15:es5.
2. Hurtado S, Cabrera NL, Lin MH, et al. Diversifying science: underrepresented student experiences in structured research programs. Res High Educ. 2008;50:189–214.
3. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.), Gentile J, Brenner KA, et al. (eds). Undergraduate research experiences for STEM students: successes, challenges, and opportunities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2017.
4. Rybarczyk B, Lerea L, Lund PK, et al. Postdoctoral training aligned with the academic professoriate. BioScience. 2011;61:699–705.
5. Uno J, Walton KLW. Young investigator perspectives. Teaching and the postdoctoral experience: impact on transition to faculty positions. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014;306:G739–40.