Abstract
Abstract
Background
Microbes’ resistance to orthodox drugs and continued emergence of new infections call for search of new drugs that can mitigate such resistance and cure newly emerging infections. Despite the therapeutic importance of Costus afer and Palisota hirsuta, the detailed pharmacognostic characters of the two plants are still missing in the literature. Thus, this study evaluated the pharmacognostic characters of these plants and the antimicrobial activity of the plants’ methanol extract. Macroscopic, microscopic, fluorescence analysis, phytochemical screening, heavy metal analysis, proximate, antimicrobial assay and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry analyses were carried out on both plants.
Results
The microscopic evaluation showed that the epidermal layer of Costus afer is hypostomatic with polygonal shaped epidermal cells and cyclotic stomata on abaxial layer while the epidermal layer of Palisota hirsuta leaf is amphistomatic, having polygonal shape epidermal cell, trichomes and paracytic stomata. The proximate analysis showed that both plants have a high carbohydrate content (C. afer: 59.13% and P. hirsuta: 68.28%) but a low crude fat content (C. afer: 1.867% and P. hirsuta: 0.233%). The heavy metal analysis revealed a high content of Manganese (266.80 mg/100 g) in Palisota hirsua, and a high content of iron (43.94 mg/100 g) in Costus afer. Both plants are free of lead. The phytochemical screening showed that both plants have saponins, tannins, flavonoids, alkaloids and cardiac glycosides. Alkaloids are the highest constituents in Costus afer (9.1%) and Palisota hirsuta (7.1%). The antimicrobial assay showed both plant extracts had the highest inhibitory effect on both bacteria and fungi at 100 mg/kg. Six compounds and 23 compounds were identified by GC–MS in C. afer and P. hirsuta, respectively. Methyl stearate (40.43%) and hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester (25.62%) were the prevailing constituents identified in C. afer and P. hirsuta, respectively.
Conclusion
The pharmacognostic features of Costus afer and Palisota hirsuta shown in this study can be used to design a suitable monograph which would be useful in compilation of another edition of Nigeria Herbal Pharmacopoeial. The dominant compounds in both plants can serve as chemotaxonomic markers for correct identification of the two plants.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. Brendler T, Eloff JN, Gurib-Fakim A, Philips LD (2010) African herbal pharmacopoeia. Association for African Medicinal Plants Standards, Mauritius
2. Omitola OJ, Sonibare MA, Elujoba AA (2019) Providing some pharmacopoeial standards for the leaves of two closely-related Alstonia Species. Niger J Pharm Res 15(2):237–247
3. Tripathi S, Pandey A (2014) Concept of standardization, extraction and pre phytochemical screening strategies for herbal drug. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 2(5):115–119
4. Majid N, Nissar S, Raja WY, Nawchoo IA, Bhat ZA (2021) Pharmacognostic standardization of Aralia cachemirica: a comparative study. Future J Pharm Sc 7(33):2–8
5. World Health Organisation (2011) Quality control methods for herbal materials. WHO, Geneva, pp 1–135
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献