Author:
Soliman Ahmed Y.,Elfadle Amr Abu
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Surgical outcomes of upper lumbar disc herniations (ULDHs) including T12-L1, L1-L2, and L2-L3 levels are characteristically less favorable and more unpredictable.
Objectives
This study was conducted to compare the surgical outcomes of decompression alone versus decompression combined with transpedicular screw fixation in treating upper lumbar disc herniation.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study was carried out at Neurosurgery Departments, Tanta University. The study included 46 patients with a symptomatic high lumbar herniated disc at T12-L1, L1-L2, and L2-L3 levels. The enrolled patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they were operated on via decompression and partial medial facetectomy (group 1, 22 patients) or via the previous maneuver plus transpedicular screw fixation (group 2, 24 patients). All patients were medically evaluated immediately after the operation; then, they were followed up at the 3rd and the 6th months following surgery. Patients’ outcomes were assessed by visual analogue score (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores.
Results
Median VAS scores in each group revealed significant reduction immediately following surgery and at each of 7 days, 3 months, and 6 months in comparison with the preoperative VAS score (p<0.001). Furthermore, each group showed significant stepwise reduction in the median ODI score at the 3rd and the 6th months postoperative compared to the preoperative ODI score (group 1 = 68.0, 19.0, 15.0; p< 0.001 and group 2 = 66.5, 20.0, 15.0; p< 0.001), with no significant differences between both groups (p> 0.05).
Conclusions
Both standalone decompression and decompression combined with transpedicular screw fixation revealed comparable favorable outcomes in patients with ULDH.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Fardon DF, Williams AL, Dohring EJ, Murtagh FR, Gabriel Rothman SL, Sze GK. Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine J. 2014;14(11):2525–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.04.022.
2. Lee D-S, Park K-S, Park M-S. The comparative analysis of clinical characteristics and surgical results between the upper and lower lumbar disc herniations. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013;54(5):379–83. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2013.54.5.379.
3. Sharifi G, Rahimzadeh A, Fereydonyan N, Divanbeigi A, HJo K. The clinical outcomes of patients with L1-L2 disc herniation treated by microsurgical trans facet approach. J Spine Neurosurg 7: 3. J Spine Neurosurg. 2018;7:2.
4. Iwasaki M, Akino M, Hida K, Yano S, Aoyama T, Saito H, et al. Clinical and radiographic characteristics of upper lumbar disc herniation: ten-year microsurgical experience. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2011;51(6):423–6. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.51.423.
5. Kim D-S, Lee J-K, Jang J-W, Ko B-S, Lee J-H, Kim S-H. Clinical features and treatments of upper lumbar disc herniations. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010;48(2):119–24. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2010.48.2.119.