Abstract
Abstract
Background
Solid renal masses often come to light as incidental findings during abdominal ultrasound examinations. Once detected, determining whether a renal mass is benign or malignant becomes imperative for informed decision-making regarding management and treatment strategies. In this investigation, the aim was to explore the diagnostic efficacy of real-time strain sonoelastography in assessing solid renal masses.
Methods
This prospective research was steered on 26 individuals diagnosed with a solid renal mass, as endorsed by pathological analysis after surgical removal or biopsy. Elastography was performed on all patients. The measurement of strain index values for tissues was achieved by placing regions of interest of equal or near-equal size on both the tumor (A) and the adjacent normal renal cortex (B).
Results
Strain elastography showed no correlation with patient’s age, size of mass and probe to mass distance with p > 0.05 all. Sensitivity analysis showed that strain index can significantly predict malignant renal masses (P = 0.003) using a cut-off point 2, with 92.9% area under curve, 95.2% sensitivity, 80% specificity, 80% negative predictive value, 95.2% positive predictive value, and overall diagnostic accuracy 92.3%. Strain index > 2 was an independent predictor for malignant renal masses (P = 0.025), odds ratio 7.29 when adjusting for other risk factors. Malignant renal masses were significantly higher strain index compared to benign lesions with (P = 0.001).
Conclusions
Strain elastography is a valuable technique for distinguishing between malignant and benign solid renal tumors. Benign lesions have lower strain index values compared to malignant ones, making the strain index a useful screening tool for distinguishing between benign and malignant renal masses using cut-off point 2.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference23 articles.
1. Elbanna KY, Krishna S, Finelli A, Atri M (2024) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the indeterminate renal mass, from the AJR “How We do It” Special series. AJR 15:7–10
2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ (2007) Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 57:43–66
3. Luciani LG, Cestari R, Tallarigo C (2000) Incidental renal cell carcinoma-age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982–1997). Urology 56:58–62
4. Kutikov A, Fossett LK, Ramchandani P, Tomaszewski JE, Siegelman ES, Banner MP et al (2006) Incidence of benign pathologic findings at partial nephrectomy for solitary renal mass presumed to be renal cell carcinoma on preoperative imaging. Urology 68:737–740
5. Tezcan FM (2020) Real time strain elastography for differentiation of solid renal masses. J Clin Med Kazakhstan. 5:38–41