Abstract
Abstract
Background
The literature review provides a concise and detailed description of the available and published data on the investigated research problem. The study summarizes findings over the last 100 years regarding clinical biomarkers during health and disease. Research expanded to present the range of enzyme acetylcholinesterase in human blood utilizing diverse methodology during the 1949–2021 year.
Main body
Data analysis includes program SPSS v23.0, frequency, percentage, numbers and graphical presentation of results. Information from the papers gathers in Microsoft Excel 2007 and contains information: study type, journal, publisher, year of publication, continent, the health status of respondents, biomarkers, number and age of participants, types of samples, methodology, goals and conclusions. Data collection includes electronic databases, the National Center for Biotechnology Information and Google Scholar, with several inclusion criteria: (1) anthropometry (2) urine (3) blood in the healthy and diseased population parameters during different physiological states of the organism. The initial number of collected and analyzed papers is 1900. The final analysis included 982 studies out of 1454 selected papers. After the selection process, 67.53% remains useful. The range of enzyme acetylcholinesterase included 107 publications.
Conclusion
The number of published scientific papers has been increasing over the years. Little practical information in scientific and clinical practice exists. There is an urgent need for concise highlighting of literature key arguments and ideas. Results apply to a specialized area of research.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Johnson R, Watkinson A, Mabe M (2018) The STM report an overview of scientific and scholarly publishing, 1968–2018, 5th ed. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. https://www.stm-assoc.org/2018_10_04_STM_Report_2018.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2020
2. Ellemers N (2021) Science as collaborative knowledge generation. Br J Soc Psychol 60(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430
3. Zeng A, Shen Z, Zhou J, Wu J, Fan Y, Wang Y, Stanley E (2016) The science of science: from the perspective of complex systems. Phys Rep 714–715(16):1–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.001
4. Fang FC, Casadevall A (2015) Competitive science: is competition ruining science? Infect Immun 83(4):1229–1233. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.02939-14
5. Aina RA, Tarik Atan T (2020) The impact of implementing talent management practices on sustainable organizational performance. Sustainability 12:8372. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208372