Strengthening accountability for tuberculosis policy implementation in South Africa: perspectives from policymakers, civil society, and communities
-
Published:2024-07-17
Issue:1
Volume:2
Page:
-
ISSN:2731-913X
-
Container-title:BMC Global and Public Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Global Public Health
Author:
van der Westhuizen Helene-Mari,Giddy Janet,Coetzee Renier,Makanda Goodman,Tisile Phumeza,Galloway Michelle,Bunyula Siyavuya,Schoeman Ingrid,Nathavitharana Ruvandhi R.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Translating health policy into effective implementation is a core priority for responding effectively to the tuberculosis (TB) crisis. The national TB Recovery Plan was developed in response to the negative impact that the COVID-19 pandemic had on TB care in South Africa. We aimed to explore the implementation of the TB Recovery Plan and develop recommendations for strengthening accountability for policy implementation for this and future TB policies.
Methods
We interviewed 24 participants working on or impacted by TB policy implementation in South Africa. This included perspectives from national, provincial, and local health department representatives, civil society, and community representatives. In-depth interviews were conducted in English and isiXhosa and we drew on reflexive thematic methods for analysis.
Results
Participants felt that there was potential for COVID-19 innovations and urgency to influence TB policy development and implementation, including the use of data dashboards. Implementation of the TB Recovery Plan predominantly used a top-down approach to implementation (cascading from national policy to local implementers) but experienced bottlenecks at provincial level. Recommendations for closing the TB policy-implementation gap included using phased implementation and enhancing provincial-level accountability. Civil society organisations were concerned about the lack of provincial implementation data which impeded advocacy for improved accountability and inadequate resourcing for implementation. Community health workers were viewed as key to implementation but were not engaged in the policy development process and were often not aware of new TB policies. At local level, there were also opportunities to strengthen community engagement in policy implementation including through community-led monitoring. Participants recommended broader multi-stakeholder engagement that includes community and community health worker representatives in the development and implementation phases of new TB policies.
Conclusions
Communities affected by TB, with the support of civil society organisations, could play a bigger role in monitoring policy implementation at local level and need to be capacitated to do this. This bottom-up approach could complement existing top-down strategies and contribute to greater accountability for TB policy implementation.
Funder
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference20 articles.
1. World Health Organisation. Global tuberculosis report 2022 [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 22]. Report No.: 978–92–4–006172–9. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240061729
2. Médecins Sans Frontières Access Campaign [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Aug 3]. Step Up for TB: TB policies in 37 countries, 4th Ed. Available from: https://msfaccess.org/step-tb-tb-policies-37-countries-4th-ed
3. Gilson L. Everyday politics and the leadership of health policy implementation. Health Syst Reform. 2016;2(3):187–93.
4. Michel J, Chimbindi N, Mohlakoana N, Orgill M, Bärnighausen T, Obrist B, et al. How and why policy-practice gaps come about: a South African Universal Health Coverage context. J Glob Health Rep. 2019;27(3):e2019069.
5. USAID. USAID report on South Africa TB Recovery Plan to mitigate the impact of COVID-19. Available from: https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/2022-05/Recovery_Plan_South_Africa_FINAL-remediated.pdf