Author:
Mokuolu Olugbenga A.,Idachaba Innocent O.,Babatunde Musibau A.,Suleiman Kafayat O.,Mokuolu Toluwani A.,Lawal Lukman,Osofisan Adenike O.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Over the last two decades, global stakeholders and the Nigerian government have invested approximately $2 billion in malaria control, reducing parasite prevalence to 23% from 42% to 2010. However, there is a risk that the modest gains will be reversed due to unmet resource gaps. Backward integration is presented in this paper as a viable option for sustainable funding of malaria intervention commodities in Nigeria.
Methods
Following a critical appraisal of the resource profile and malaria expenditure, a conceptual framework on backward integration as a means of ensuring long-term supply of malaria intervention commodities was developed. The study analysed secondary annual data from the National Malaria Elimination Programme to estimate commodity needs for the period 2018–2020, as well as total resources committed and the financial gap.
Results
The funds needed to implement national malaria interventions from 2018 to 2020 totaled US$ 1,122,332,318, of which US$ 531,228,984 (47.3%) were funded. The Nigerian government contributed 2.5%, the Global Fund (26.7%), the President’s Malaria Initiative (16.5%), and the UK Department for International Development (6.2%). The funding shortfall was $591,103,335, or 52.7% of the needs. Various funding scenarios were evaluated for their relative merits and limitations, including advocacy for more external funding, bank borrowing, increased domestic resources, and backward integration.
Conclusions
The study concluded that backward integration should be used, based on a government-led public-private partnership that will increase local production of malaria intervention commodities that are accessible and affordable through market-based demand and supply arrangements.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Parasitology
Reference26 articles.
1. WHO. World malaria report 2022. Geneva: Organization WH. 2022. https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme/reports/world-malaria-report-2022.
2. WHO. Global Malaria Programme. Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: round 8 (2016–2018). Geneva: World Health Organization. 2018. http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/9789241510035/en/.
3. Alba S, Dillip A, Hetzel MW, Mayumana I, Mshana C, Makemba A, et al. Improvements in access to malaria treatment in Tanzania following community, retail sector and health facility interventions—a user perspective. Malar J. 2005;4:55.
4. Aregawi M, Cibulskis RE, Otten M, Williams R, WHO. Global Malaria Programme. Disease surveillance for malaria elimination. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
5. Smith LA, Jones C, Meek S, Webster J, Review. Provider practice and user behavior interventions to improve prompt and effective treatment of malaria: do we know what works? Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80:326–35.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献