Author:
Wagman Joseph,Chanda Benjamin,Chanda Javan,Saili Kochelani,Orange Erica,Mambo Patricia,Muyabe Rayford,Kaniki Tresford,Mwenya Mwansa,Ng’andu Mirabelle,Sakala Jimmy,Ngulube Willy,Miller John,Arnzen Annie,Silumbe Kafula,Mwaanga Gift,Simubali Limonty,Mungo Alice,Mburu Monicah M.,Simulundu Edgar,Mambwe Brenda,Kasaro Racheal,Mulube Conceptor,Mwenda Mulenga,Hamainza Busiku,Ashton Ruth A.,Eisele Thomas P.,Harris Angela F.,Entwistle Julian,Yukich Joshua,Slutsker Laurence,Burkot Thomas R.,Littrell Megan
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Attractive targeted sugar bait (ATSB) stations are a novel tool with potential to complement current approaches to malaria vector control. To assess the public health value of ATSB station deployment in areas of high coverage with standard vector control, a two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial (cRCT) of Sarabi ATSB® stations (Westham Ltd., Hod-Hasharon, Israel) was conducted in Western Province, Zambia, a high-burden location were Anopheles funestus is the dominant vector. The trial included 70 clusters and was designed to measure the effect of ATSBs on case incidence and infection prevalence over two 7-month deployments. Reported here are results of the vector surveillance component of the study, conducted in a subset of 20 clusters and designed to provide entomological context to guide overall interpretation of trial findings.
Methods
Each month, 200 paired indoor-outdoor human landing catch (HLC) and 200 paired light trap (LT) collections were conducted to monitor An. funestus parity, abundance, biting rates, sporozoite prevalence, and entomological inoculation rates (EIR).
Results
During the study 20,337 female An. funestus were collected, 11,229 from control and 9,108 from intervention clusters. A subset of 3,131 HLC specimens were assessed for parity: The mean non-parous proportion was 23.0% (95% CI 18.2–28.7%, total n = 1477) in the control and 21.2% (95% CI 18.8–23.9%, total n = 1654) in the intervention arm, an OR = 1.05 (95% CI 0.82–1.34; p = 0.688). A non-significant reduction in LT abundance (RR = 0.65 [95% CI 0.30–1.40, p = 0.267]) was associated with ATSB deployment. HLC rates were highly variable, but model results indicate a similar non-significant trend with a RR = 0.68 (95%CI 0.22–2.00; p = 0.479). There were no effects on sporozoite prevalence or EIR.
Conclusions
Anopheles funestus parity did not differ across study arms, but ATSB deployment was associated with a non-significant 35% reduction in vector LT density, results that are consistent with the epidemiological impact reported elsewhere. Additional research is needed to better understand how to maximize the potential impact of ATSB approaches in Zambia and other contexts.
Trial registration number: This trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04800055, 16 March 2021).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Bhatt S, Weiss DJ, Cameron E, Bisanzio D, Mappin B, Dalrymple U, et al. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature. 2015;526:207–11.
2. WHO. World malaria report 2022. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2022. Available: https://www.who.int/teams/global-malaria-programme
3. Carnevale P, Manguin S. Review of issues on residual malaria transmission. J Infect Dis. 2021;223:S61–80.
4. WHO. World Malaria Report 2023. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240086173
5. Killeen GF. Characterizing, controlling and eliminating residual malaria transmission. Malar J. 2014;13:330.