Author:
Khalid Mohamed Sahar,Khalid Mohamed Duha,Ahmed Khansaa,Saad Fadwa,Zurovac Dejan
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Nonadherence to national standards for malaria diagnosis and treatment has been reported in Sudan. In this study, qualitative research examined the clinical domains of nonadherence, factors influencing nonadherent practices and health workers’ views on how to improve adherence.
Methods
In September 2023, five Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were undertaken with 104 health workers from 42 health facilities in Sudan’s Northern State. The participants included medical assistants, doctors, nurses, laboratory personnel, pharmacists and public health officers. The FGDs followed a semi-structured guide reflecting the national malaria case management protocol. Qualitative thematic analysis was performed.
Results
Nonadherent practices included disregarding parasitological test results, suboptimal paediatric artemether–lumefantrine (AL) dosing, lack of counselling, use of prohibited artemether injections for uncomplicated and severe malaria, artesunate dose approximations and suboptimal preparations, lack of AL follow on treatment for severe malaria; and rare use of primaquine for radical Plasmodium vivax treatment and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine as the second-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria. Factors influencing nonadherence included stock-outs of anti-malarials and RDTs; staff shortages; lack of training, job aids and supervision; malpractice by specialists; distrust of malaria microscopy and RDTs; and patient pressure for diagnosis and treatment. Health workers recommended strengthening the supply chain; hiring personnel; providing in-service protocol training including specialists; establishing external quality assurance for malaria diagnosis; and providing onsite supportive supervision and public health campaigns.
Conclusions
This study revealed a broad spectrum of behavioural and systemic challenges in malaria management among frontline health workers in Northern Sudan, including nonadherence to protocols due to resource shortages, training gaps, a lack of supportive supervision and patient pressure. These insights, including health workers’ views about improvements, will inform evidence-based interventions by Sudan’s National Malaria Control Programme to improve health systems readiness and the quality of malaria case management.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. WHO. World malaria report 2023. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.
2. Federal Ministry of Health—Sudan. Malaria program review, 2023. National Malaria Control Program; 2023.
3. World Bank. Socioeconomic impact of COVID-19 on Sudanese households. Central Bureau of Statistics—Sudan. December 2020. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/394981620725892919/pdf/Socioeconomic-Impact-of-COVID-19-on-Sudanese-Households.pdf. Accessed 24 Feb 2024.
4. WHO. Three months of violence in Sudan: health hanging in the balance. WHO—Regional Office for Africa; 2023. https://www.afro.who.int/news/three-months-violence-sudan-health-hanging-balance. Accessed 10 Dec 2023.
5. WHO. Health needs heighten as Sudan conflict displaces millions of people. WHO—Eastern Mediterranean region; 2023. http://www.emro.who.int/media/news/health-needs-heighten-as-sudan-conflict-displaces-millions-of-people.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2023.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献