Abstract
Abstract
Background
Fever in under-five children (U5) is the commonest presenting complaint in general practice and mothers’ recognition is an entry point for fever treatment, including malaria. This study describes rural–urban disparity in fever prevalence in U5, mothers’ malaria knowledge, care-seeking, testing for malaria before anti-malarial medication and the associated factors.
Methods
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 630 mother–child pairs [rural (300) and urban (330)] selected randomly using a multi-stage sampling from 63 villages in Igabi LGA, Kaduna State, Nigeria. Trained female data collectors administered a pre-tested structured questionnaire to collect information on mother–child demographic profiles, malaria knowledge, fever episodes in birth order last child in two weeks prior to survey, blood testing before anti-malarial use, and delayed care-seeking defined as care sought for fever > 48 h of onset. Malaria knowledge was categorized into good, average, and poor if the final scores were ≥ 75th, 50th–74th, and < 50th percentiles, respectively. Frequency, proportions, and odds ratio were calculated. Statistically significant was set at p-value < 0.05.
Results
The median age (interquartile range) of rural mothers was 30 (IQR, 10) years compared to 27 (IQR, 6) years in urban. Of the 70.0% (441/629) U5 children with fever, 58.5% (258/441) were in rural settlements. A third of the mothers whose child had fever sought care. Mothers in rural settlements were 2.8 (adjusted OR: 2.8, CI 1.8–4.2, p < 0.01) times more likely to delay care-seeking for fever. Other significant factors were poor or no knowledge of malaria transmission, poor perception of malaria as a major health problem, and household size > 5. Also, mothers who had no formal education were four times more likely to receive anti-malarial medications without testing for malaria compared to their educated counterpart (adjusted OR: 4.0, 95% CI 1.6–9.9, p < 0.000).
Conclusions
Rural–urban disparities existed between fever prevalence in U5 children, care-seeking practices by their mothers, and factors associated with delayed care-seeking and testing the fever for malaria before anti-malarial medication. Fever treatment for high impact malaria elimination in Nigeria needs a context-specific intervention rather than ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach.
Funder
US Center for Disease Control and Prevention
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Parasitology
Reference29 articles.
1. WHO. World malaria report 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.
2. National Malaria Elimination Programme (NMEP), National Population Commission (NPopC), National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) and ICF International. Malaria indicator survey 2015: key Indicators. Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, Maryland, USA; 2016.
3. ICF International and NPC Nigeria. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018. Abuja: ICF International and NPC Nigeria; 2019.
4. World Malaria Report RP to EM. High burden to high impact: a targeted malaria response. WHO/CDS/GMP/2018.25.Rev.1. Geneva; 2019. https://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/high-impact-response/en/.
5. WHO. Informal consultation on fever management in peripheral health care settings: a global review of evidence and practice. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. https://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/9789241506489/en/.