Author:
Gidey Bokretsion,Nega Desalegn,Abera Adugna,Abebe Abnet,Mekasha Sindew,Tasew Geremew,Haile Mebrahtom,Dillu Dereje,Mehari Degu,Assefa Ashenafi,Liknew Wondimeneh,G/Tsadik Abeba,Mohammed Hussien,Woldie Ermias,Getachew Tsegaye,Ararso Desalegn,Yenealem Dereje,Kebede Adisu,Etana Kebede,Kedida Gizachew,Solomon Hiwot,Tollera Getachew,Woyessa Adugna,Abate Ebba
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In Ethiopia, malaria cases are declining as a result of proven interventions, and in 2017 the country launched a malaria elimination strategy in targeted settings. Accurate malaria diagnosis and prompt treatment are the key components of the strategy to prevent morbidity and stop the continuation of transmission. However, the quality of microscopic diagnosis in general is deteriorating as malaria burden declines. This study was carried out to evaluate the competency of microscopists and the performance of health facilities on malaria microscopic diagnosis.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 August to 30 September, 2019 in 9 regional states and one city administration. A standard checklist was used for on-site evaluation, archived patient slides were re-checked and proficiency of microscopists was tested using a WHO-certified set of slides from the national slide bank at the Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI). The strength of agreement, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.
Results
In this study, 102 health facilities (84 health centres and 18 hospitals) were included, from which 202 laboratory professionals participated. In slide re-checking, moderate agreement (agreement (A): 76.0%; Kappa (K): 0.41) was observed between experts and microscopists on malaria detection in all health facilities. The sensitivity and specificity of routine slide reading and the re-checking results were 78.1 and 80.7%, respectively. Likewise, positive predictive value of 65.1% and negative predictive value of 88.8% were scored in the routine diagnosis. By panel testing, a substantial overall agreement (A: 91.8%; K: 0.79) was observed between microscopists and experts in detecting malaria parasites. The sensitivity and specificity in the detection of malaria parasites was 92.7 and 89.1%, respectively. In identifying species, a slight agreement (A: 57%; K: 0.18) was observed between microscopists and experts.
Conclusion
The study found significant false positive and false negative results in routine microscopy on slide re-checking of Plasmodium parasites. Moreover, reduced grade in parasite species identification was reported on the panel tests. Implementing comprehensive malaria microscopy mentorship, in-service training and supportive supervision are key strategies to improve the overall performance of health facilities in malaria microscopy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Parasitology
Reference32 articles.
1. WHO. World Malaria Report. 20 years of global progress and challenges. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. p. 2020.
2. FDRE, Ministry of Health: National Malaria Elimination Roadmap, 2017.
3. PMI-Ethiopia: Ethiopia Malaria Operational Plan FY, 2019.
4. FDRE, Ministry of Health: National Malaria Programme Monitoring and Evaluation Plan, 2014-2020. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2014.
5. Maguire JD, Laderman ER, Barcus MJ, Prudhomme WA, Jordon RG, Duong S, et al. Production and validation of durable, high quality standardized malaria microscopy slides for teaching, testing and quality assurance during an era of declining diagnostic proficiency. Malar J. 2006;5:92.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献