Predicting the risk of malaria re-introduction in countries certified malaria-free: a systematic review
-
Published:2023-06-06
Issue:1
Volume:22
Page:
-
ISSN:1475-2875
-
Container-title:Malaria Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Malar J
Author:
Lu Guangyu,Zhang Dongying,Chen Juan,Cao Yuanyuan,Chai Liying,Liu Kaixuan,Chong Zeying,Zhang Yuying,Lu Yan,Heuschen Anna-Katharina,Müller Olaf,Zhu Guoding,Cao Jun
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Predicting the risk of malaria in countries certified malaria-free is crucial for the prevention of re-introduction. This review aimed to identify and describe existing prediction models for malaria re-introduction risk in eliminated settings.
Methods
A systematic literature search following the PRISMA guidelines was carried out. Studies that developed or validated a malaria risk prediction model in eliminated settings were included. At least two authors independently extracted data using a pre-defined checklist developed by experts in the field. The risk of bias was assessed using both the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST) and the adapted Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (aNOS).
Results
A total 10,075 references were screened and 10 articles describing 11 malaria re-introduction risk prediction models in 6 countries certified malaria free. Three-fifths of the included prediction models were developed for the European region. Identified parameters predicting malaria re-introduction risk included environmental and meteorological, vectorial, population migration, and surveillance and response related factors. Substantial heterogeneity in predictors was observed among the models. All studies were rated at a high risk of bias by PROBAST, mostly because of a lack of internal and external validation of the models. Some studies were rated at a low risk of bias by the aNOS scale.
Conclusions
Malaria re-introduction risk remains substantial in many countries that have eliminated malaria. Multiple factors were identified which could predict malaria risk in eliminated settings. Although the population movement is well acknowledged as a risk factor associated with the malaria re-introduction risk in eliminated settings, it is not frequently incorporated in the risk prediction models. This review indicated that the proposed models were generally poorly validated. Therefore, future emphasis should be first placed on the validation of existing models.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Zoonosis
International Research Laboratory of Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonotic Diseases of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Parasitic Disease Control and Prevention and Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory on Parasite and Vector Control Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Parasitology
Reference52 articles.
1. WHO. World malaria report 2022. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
2. WHO. More malaria cases and deaths in 2020 linked to COVID-19 disruptions. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
3. WHO. Guidelines on prevention of the reintroduction of malaria. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
4. Baldari M, Tamburro A, Sabatinelli G, Romi R, Severini C, Cuccagna G, et al. Malaria in Maremma. Italy Lancet. 1998;351:1246–7.
5. Kampen H, Proft J, Etti S, Maltezos E, Pagonaki M, Maier WA, et al. Individual cases of autochthonous malaria in Evros Province, northern Greece: entomological aspects. Parasitol Res. 2003;89:252–8.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献