Author:
Kennard Alice L,Rainsford Suzanne,Hamilton Kelly L,Glasgow Nicholas J,Pumpa Kate L,Douglas Angela M,Talaulikar Girish S
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Understanding the patient perspective of frailty is critical to offering holistic patient-centred care. Rehabilitation strategies for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and frailty are limited in their ability to overcome patient-perceived barriers to participation, resulting in high rates of drop-out and non-adherence. The aim of this study was to explore patient perspectives and preferences regarding experiences with rehabilitation to inform a CKD/Frailty rehabilitation model.
Methods
This qualitative study involved two focus groups, six individual semi-structured interviews and three caregiver semi-structured interviews with lived experience of advanced kidney disease and frailty. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded for meaningful concepts and analysed using inductive thematic analysis using constant comparative method of data analysis employing Social Cognitive Theory.
Results
Six major themes emerged including accommodating frailty is an act of resilience, exercise is endorsed for rehabilitation but existing programs have failed to meet end-users’ needs. Rehabilitation goals were framed around return to normative behaviours and rehabilitation should have a social dimension, offering understanding for “people like us”. Participants reported on barriers and disruptors to frailty rehabilitation in the CKD context. Participants valued peer-to-peer education, the camaraderie of socialisation and the benefit of feedback for maintaining motivation. Patients undertaking dialysis described the commodity of time and the burden of unresolved symptoms as barriers to participation. Participants reported difficulty envisioning strategies for frailty rehabilitation, maintaining a focus on the immediate and avoidance of future uncertainty.
Conclusions
Frailty rehabilitation efforts in CKD should leverage shared experiences, address comorbidity and symptom burden and focus on goals with normative value.
Funder
The Canberra Hospital Private Practice Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet (British Edition). 2013;381(9868):752–62.
2. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. Journals Gerontol Ser Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–56.
3. Kennard A, Rainsford S, Hamilton K, Glasgow N, Pumpa K, Douglas A, Talaulikar G. Understanding the lived experience of Frailty in the chronic kidney Disease Context using Social Cognitive Theory: an exploratory qualitative study. Int J Geriatr Gerontol. 2024;8(180).
4. Kennard AL, Rainsford S, Glasgow NJ, Talaulikar GS. Use of frailty assessment instruments in nephrology populations: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr. 2023;23(1):449.
5. Hannan M, Chen J, Hsu J, Zhang X, Saunders MR, Brown J, et al. Frailty and Cardiovascular outcomes in adults with CKD: findings from the chronic renal insufficiency cohort (CRIC) study. Am J Kidney Diseases: Official J Natl Kidney Foundation. 2024;83(2):208–15.