Author:
Newall Emma,Reiss Michael J.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
It has long been acknowledged that evolution is a difficult topic for many students, partly because of the conceptual demands it makes, and partly because for some students an acceptance of evolution conflicts with their religious beliefs. The study we report on here was designed to see if there were additional reasons why evolution might be a difficult topic for certain students.
Results
Using in-depth, semi-structured interviews with seventeen adults studying for education qualifications, we show that evolution is a difficult topic for certain people because it can give rise to existential concerns. Thematic content analysis of interview transcripts revealed six themes associated with existential concerns: time, identity, death, responsibility/freedom, meaninglessness, and isolation. Analysis revealed that the topic of evolution frequently gave rise to feelings of disquiet.
Conclusions
Because it concerns issues to do with death, extinction and change, evolution can be deeply unsettling for many people, even if they may have difficulty articulating why this is so. Teachers when they teach evolution therefore need to consider at least three overlapping constituencies who may find evolution difficult: those for whom it is cognitively challenging; those who reject aspects of evolution on religious grounds; and those who are uncomfortable with evolution for existential reasons. Teacher educators need to decide how best to prepare new teachers for these challenges. We argue that a pedagogy based on two approaches—treating evolution as a conceptually demanding topic and treating it as a sensitive issue—may provide a way forward.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference77 articles.
1. Alters BJ, Nelson CE. Perspective: teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution. 2002;56(10):1891–901.
2. Alvesson M, Sköldberg K. Reflexive methodology: new vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage; 2000.
3. Anderson R. Thematic content analysis (TCA): descriptive presentation of qualitative data; 2007. http://rosemarieanderson.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ThematicContentAnalysis.pdf.
4. Arnold K. Intellectualization and its lookalikes. Psychoanal Rev. 2014;101(5):615–32.
5. Asghar A, Wiles JR, Alters B. Canadian pre-service elementary teachers’ conceptions of biological evolution and evolution education. McGill J Educ. 2007;42(2):189–210.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献