Abstract
AbstractWith a detailed historical analysis of postwar Japanese female employment, this article presents three underlying policy perspectives that shape the fact that women have less chance for high-quality employment despite the rising labor force participation rate. The three assumptions of women's role in policy-making are as follows: (1) women as housewives—dependent on males, do not earn a living salary and are thus marginalized in the labor market; (2) women as individuals pursuing gender equality should be treated without discrimination in the workplace; and (3) women as key drivers for economic growth can contribute to the solution to labor shortages. The postwar history of Japanese female employment is full of interaction among these three policy perspectives. Generally, it passes through phases of the dominance of the housewife perspective, the reformation from the equality perspective and the counterattack from the housewife perspective, as well as the mainstreaming of the economic actor perspective.
Funder
Chinese Academy of Social Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Abe, Shinzo. 2013. Unleashing the Power of “Womenomics”. Wall Street Journal, Sept 25, 2013. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303759604579091680931293404.
2. Aoki, Masahiko. 1988. Information, Incentives, and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Dore, Ronald. 1973. British Factory Japanese Factory: The Origins of National Diversity in Industrial Relations. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
4. Esping-Andersen, GøSta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. Esping-Andersen, GøSta. 1997. Hybrid or Unique? The Japanese Welfare State Between Europe and America. Journal of European Social Policy 7 (3): 179–189.