Author:
Mori Masahiko,Yokoyama Kazuaki,Sanuki Riri,Inoue Fumio,Maekawa Takafumi,Moriyama Tadayoshi
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Demand for COVID-19 testing prompted the implementation of drive-through testing systems. However, limited research has examined factors influencing testing positivity in this setting.
Methods
From October 2020 to March 2023, a total of 1,341 patients, along with their clinical information, were referred from local clinics to the Sasebo City COVID-19 drive-through PCR center for testing. Association between clinical information or factors related to the drive-through center and testing results was analyzed by Fisher’s exact test and logistic regression models.
Results
Individuals testing positive exhibited higher frequencies of upper respiratory symptoms; cough (OR 1.5 (95% CI 1.2–1.8), p < 0.001, q = 0.005), sore throat (OR 2.4 (95% CI 1.9-3.0), p < 0.001, q < 0.001), runny nose (OR 1.4 (95% CI 1.1–1.8), p = 0.002, q = 0.009), and systemic symptoms; fever (OR 1.5 (95% CI 1.1-2.0), p = 0.006, q = 0.02), headache (OR 1.9 (95% CI 1.4–2.5), p < 0.001, q < 0.001), and joint pain (OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.8–4.1), p < 0.001, q < 0.001). Conversely, gastrointestinal symptoms; diarrhea (OR 0.2 (95% CI 0.1–0.4), p < 0.001, q < 0.001) and nausea (OR 0.3 (95% CI 0.1–0.6), p < 0.001, q < 0.001) were less prevalent among positives. During omicron strain predominant period, higher testing positivity rate (OR 20 (95% CI 13–31), p < 0.001) and shorter period from symptom onset to testing (3.2 vs. 6.0 days, p < 0.001) were observed compared to pre-omicron period. Besides symptoms, contact history with infected persons at home (OR 4.5 (95% CI 3.1–6.5), p < 0.001, q < 0.001) and in office or school (OR 2.9 (95% CI 2.1–4.1), p < 0.001, q < 0.001), as well as the number of sample collection experiences by collectors (B 7.2 (95% CI 2.8–12), p = 0.002) were also associated with testing results.
Conclusions
These findings underscore the importance of factors related to drive-through centers, especially contact history interviews and sample collection skills, for achieving higher rates of COVID-19 testing positivity. They also contribute to enhanced preparedness for next infectious disease pandemics.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. 2023. Visualizing the data: information on COVID-19 infections. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan. https://covid19.mhlw.go.jp/en/. 2023. Accessed 31 Oct 2023.
2. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/. 2023. Accessed 31 Oct 2023.
3. Evans LK, Shinagawa A, Sutton S, Calvo L. COVID-19 drive-through Point of Screening and Testing (POST) system: a safe, efficient, and adaptable model for nasopharyngeal Swab Collection. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022;16(1):194–200. Epub 2020/09/03.
4. Shah A, Challener D, Tande AJ, Mahmood M, O’Horo JC, Berbari E et al. Drive-Through Testing: A Unique, Efficient Method of Collecting Large Volume of Specimens During the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Pandemic. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(7):1420-5. Epub 2020/05/26.
5. Parcell BJ, Brechin K, Allstaff S, Park M, Third W, Bean S, et al. Drive-through testing for SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic health and social care workers and household members: an observational cohort study. Thorax. 2020;75(12):1109–11. Epub 2020/08/29.